All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmx,svm: Add module parameter to ignore the 'in use' check
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:14:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E12F212.9050606@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309864039.4117.57.camel@sasha>

On 07/05/2011 02:07 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >
> >  - was a BIOS update attempted?  at least VMware uses the same check as
> >  kvm, and probably virtualbox as well, so this problem should have been
> >  seen before.
>
> We didn't update the BIOS.
>
> virtualbox was installed previously and didn't work properly either -
> thats why he tried kvm afaik.

That's a good data point.

> >  - was this after a reset or cold boot?
>
> This was a reset, we didn't try a cold boot.

Unlikely to help, since it was a preexisting problem.

> >  - maybe a stealth rootkit is involved?
> >
>
> A rootkit that messed up the MSRs or runs a hidden guest sounds like a
> possibility too.
>
> Alexander Graf suggested it's a simple case of a BIOS vendor not
> implementing specs properly as he has seen a similar case of BIOS only
> allowing to start virtualization on the first CPU.

I agree.  But let's try a BIOS update first, if possible.

If that fails, please repost the patches, but for svm only, since we 
haven't seen these issues on Intel.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


      reply	other threads:[~2011-07-05 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-04 23:09 [PATCH 1/2] vmx,svm: Add module parameter to ignore the 'in use' check Sasha Levin
2011-07-04 23:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] vmx,svm: Print errors if SVM or VMX were already set Sasha Levin
2011-07-05  0:42   ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-05  6:16     ` Tian, Kevin
2011-07-05  6:14   ` Tian, Kevin
2011-07-05  8:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] vmx,svm: Add module parameter to ignore the 'in use' check Avi Kivity
2011-07-05  8:14   ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-05  9:11     ` Joerg Roedel
2011-07-05  9:32       ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-05  9:37         ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-05  9:56           ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-05 10:37             ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-05 11:07               ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-05 11:14                 ` Avi Kivity [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E12F212.9050606@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.