From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Ohlstein Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH v2] msm: timer: compensate for timer shift in msm_read_timer_count Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:15:41 -0700 Message-ID: <4E1362DD.7030001@codeaurora.org> References: <1308344138-2862-1-git-send-email-johlstei@codeaurora.org> <20110620215922.GA21909@kroah.com> <8ya7h8gozhn.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> <20110621162427.GA28836@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:40642 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752494Ab1GETPm (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2011 15:15:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110621162427.GA28836@kroah.com> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: David Brown , Russell King , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bryan Huntsman , Daniel Walker , stable@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 04:27:16PM -0700, David Brown wrote: >> I don't think this patch was intended for stable in the first place. >> Jeff, this is a fix for 3.0-rcx, right? > > Then why was it sent to stable@kernel.org? > > confused, > > greg k-h > Sorry, this was indeed intended for stable. I will include the Cc: tag in future patches stable. However, since this was already picked up in Linus's tree, how should I proceed to get it into stable? Jeff -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: johlstei@codeaurora.org (Jeff Ohlstein) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:15:41 -0700 Subject: [stable] [PATCH v2] msm: timer: compensate for timer shift in msm_read_timer_count In-Reply-To: <20110621162427.GA28836@kroah.com> References: <1308344138-2862-1-git-send-email-johlstei@codeaurora.org> <20110620215922.GA21909@kroah.com> <8ya7h8gozhn.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> <20110621162427.GA28836@kroah.com> Message-ID: <4E1362DD.7030001@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 04:27:16PM -0700, David Brown wrote: >> I don't think this patch was intended for stable in the first place. >> Jeff, this is a fix for 3.0-rcx, right? > > Then why was it sent to stable at kernel.org? > > confused, > > greg k-h > Sorry, this was indeed intended for stable. I will include the Cc: tag in future patches stable. However, since this was already picked up in Linus's tree, how should I proceed to get it into stable? Jeff -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.