From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from hd5b91d02.k46641.sta.perspektivbredband.net ([213.185.29.2] helo=fg-dc1.flatfrog.local) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QeOiq-0006JI-Ls for Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:48:44 +0200 Received: from [192.168.123.162] (192.168.123.162) by fg-dc1.flatfrog.local (192.168.123.3) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.83.0; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:43:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4E142E2F.6040101@flatfrog.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:43:11 +0200 From: Orjan Friberg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Received-SPF: None (fg-dc1.flatfrog.local: of@flatfrog.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.6.0.1168-6.500.1024-18242.004 X-TM-AS-Result: No-5.593500-8.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No Subject: Discouraged kernels 2.6.35+? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 09:48:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, We're looking at upgrading our BeagleBoard-derived board to 2.6.35+. Out of the kernels available where COMPATIBLE_MACHINE=beagleboard, is there any we should avoid? (The ones available are .35, .37, .38, and .39.) I'm thinking if there was an aborted porting attempt at some stage, or if a kernel was ported but never saw any actual use. Also, on the 2011.03-maintenance branch, are all kernels valid or should we stick to the default kernel (.32)? Thanks, Orjan -- Orjan Friberg FlatFrog Laboratories AB