All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>, Richard Lary <rlary@us.ibm.com>,
	"wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
	"Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net" <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	"chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn" <chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn>
Subject: Re: Warning: iwlegacy/iwlwifi/rtlwifi  : removal of PCI_CAP_ID_EXP
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 10:38:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E147363.1060001@emulex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E0DDE5D.8040904@emulex.com>

FYI:   after discussion of this error on linux-pci and linuxppc-dev, the error 
was corrected in a patch checked into 2.6.33-rc6/3.0-rc6 
(http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130992047232053&w=2)

-- james s




On 7/1/2011 10:49 AM, James Smart wrote:
> All,
>
> I wanted to communicate a potential warning to those drivers that had a patch
> submitted to replace config space searches of PCI_CAP_ID_EXP with shorthand
> options such as is_pcie and pci_is_pcie().
>
> Testing with the lpfc driver and AER/EEH identified cases where the short-hand
> search options would fail on PPC platforms.  The only successful option in all
> cases was the explicit search via PCI_CAP_ID_EXP.   Therefore, I recommend
> that this change not be accepted until the platform level issue can be
> identified and corrected.
>
> -- james s
>
>
>
> On 6/30/2011 4:41 PM, James Smart wrote:
>> Jon,
>>
>> I must NACK this patch to the lpfc driver and recommend that all other patches
>> which replace pci_find_capability(pdef, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP) with
>> "pci_is_pcie(pdev)" are NACK'd as well.
>>
>> The reason is due to an issue on PPC platforms whereby use of "pdev->is_pcie"
>> and pci_is_pcie() will erroneously fail under some conditions, but explicit
>> search for the capability struct via pci_find_capability() is always
>> successful.   I expect this to be due a shadowing of pci config space in the
>> hal/platform that isn't sufficiently built up.  We detected this issue while
>> testing AER/EEH, and are functional only if the pci_find_capability() option
>> is used.
>>
>> -- james s
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/27/2011 1:39 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
>>> The PCIE capability offset is saved during PCI bus walking.  It will
>>> remove an unnecessary search in the PCI configuration space if this
>>> value is referenced instead of reacquiring it.  Also, pci_is_pcie is a
>>> better way of determining if the device is PCIE or not (as it uses the
>>> same saved PCIE capability offset).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason<jdmason@kudzu.us>
>>> ---
>>>     drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c |    2 +-
>>>     1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
>>> index 148b98d..9000ad0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
>>> @@ -3970,7 +3970,7 @@ lpfc_enable_pci_dev(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>>>     	pci_save_state(pdev);
>>>
>>>     	/* PCIe EEH recovery on powerpc platforms needs fundamental reset */
>>> -	if (pci_find_capability(pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP))
>>> +	if (pci_is_pcie(pdev))
>>>     		pdev->needs_freset = 1;
>>>
>>>     	return 0;
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-06 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-27 17:39 [PATCH 03/19] lpfc: remove unnecessary read of PCI_CAP_ID_EXP Jon Mason
2011-06-30 20:40 ` James Smart
2011-06-30 20:41 ` James Smart
2011-07-01 14:48   ` Warning: qla4xxx/qla2xxx/lpfc : removal " James Smart
2011-07-01 15:10     ` Jon Mason
2011-07-06  3:15       ` Jon Mason
2011-07-01 14:49   ` Warning: iwlegacy/iwlwifi/rtlwifi " James Smart
2011-07-01 15:08     ` Jon Mason
2011-07-02 16:49       ` Larry Finger
2011-07-02 17:04         ` Jon Mason
2011-07-04  1:47         ` Adrian Chadd
2011-07-06  3:15       ` Jon Mason
     [not found]   ` <4E0CDF8B.3020505-laKkSmNT4hbQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-07-01 14:49     ` Warning: mthca/qib " James Smart
     [not found]       ` <6dbdff99-df75-4456-ac0e-b35ac475f079-nbYkmrCdWxmgMrCBcu8zE0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2011-07-01 15:01         ` Mike Marciniszyn
     [not found]           ` <35AAF1E4A771E142979F27B51793A4888838F2367E-HolNjIBXvBOXx9kJd3VG2h2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-07-01 15:07             ` Jon Mason
     [not found]               ` <BANLkTimT5SaRupWoC+60sgdgsvW2a_T3_g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-07-06  3:16                 ` Jon Mason
2011-07-01 15:05   ` [PATCH 03/19] lpfc: remove unnecessary read " Jon Mason
     [not found]   ` <9c96a4a4-c1e3-4af2-a129-db1ce80a2973@exht1.ad.emulex.com>
     [not found]     ` <BANLkTi=BCC3PO_LecW77ht+kBAAVD6=Kgw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-07-06  3:14       ` Warning: myri10ge/sky2/vxge/r8169/niu/bnx2/bnx2x/igb/e100e/cxgb3/mlx4/tg3/vxge : removal " Jon Mason
     [not found]   ` <4E0DDE55.30006@emulex.com>
2011-07-06 14:38     ` Warning: qla4xxx/qla2xxx/lpfc " James Smart
     [not found]   ` <4E0DDE5D.8040904@emulex.com>
2011-07-06 14:38     ` James Smart [this message]
     [not found]   ` <4E0DDE68.5040904@emulex.com>
     [not found]     ` <4E0DDE68.5040904-laKkSmNT4hbQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-07-06 14:38       ` Warning: mthca/qib " James Smart
2011-07-06 14:39 ` [PATCH 03/19] lpfc: remove unnecessary read " James Smart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E147363.1060001@emulex.com \
    --to=james.smart@emulex.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn \
    --cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rlary@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.