From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>,
Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>,
x86@kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] trace: Add x86 irq vector entry/exit tracepoints
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:02:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E14F797.8070501@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110706235613.GA21115@somewhere>
On 07/06/2011 04:56 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> And even if tracepoints are not supposed to be stable ABI (I actually believe there
> is no absolute answer to that, it depends on the tracepoint and on the context),
> tools are much happier with a common tracepoint interface amongst archs.
What you're suggesting here is an ad hoc ABI. This is insanely
irresponsible -- ABIs need to be designed, not randomly appeared.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-07 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-22 22:56 [PATCH] trace: Add special x86 irq entry/exit tracepoints Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-25 23:41 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-28 23:16 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-28 23:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-29 20:12 ` [PATCH] trace: Add x86 irq vector " Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-29 20:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-29 22:04 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-05-31 21:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-06-01 0:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-01 22:38 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-06-01 23:30 ` David Sharp
2011-06-16 3:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-21 18:43 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-06 23:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-06 23:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-07 0:02 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-07-07 0:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-07 0:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-07 0:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-07 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-07 22:50 ` David Sharp
2011-07-07 23:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-21 18:45 ` [PATCH v3] " Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-06 21:50 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-06 23:38 ` Andi Kleen
2011-07-07 23:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-08 0:54 ` David Sharp
2011-07-11 15:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-11 18:21 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-12 18:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-12 22:08 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-13 14:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-13 18:18 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-29 0:14 ` [PATCH] trace: Add special x86 irq " Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-29 20:15 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E14F797.8070501@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=dhsharp@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiayingz@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mrubin@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vnagarnaik@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.