From: Bernard F6BVP <f6bvp@free.fr>
To: Miroslav Skoric <skoric@EUnet.rs>
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Linux nodes instead of BPQ32 nodes in the LAN
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 23:27:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E18C7BC.60400@free.fr> (raw)
Hello Miroslav,
Giving us the listing of your /etc/ax25/axports
and /etc/ax25/ax25d.conf files would be helpful
for it looks like you did not declare any ax25 ports
in those files.
According to http://www.linuxselfhelp.com/HOWTO/AX25-HOWTO/x495.html :
"To configure the BPQ support you need to configure the Ethernet device
with an AX.25 callsign. The following command will do this for you:
# /sbin/ifconfig bpq0 hw ax25 vk2ktj-14 up
Again, remember that the callsign you specify should match the entry in
the /etc/ax25/axports file that you wish to use for this port."
Look at paragraph 6.2 in previous page link.
Concerning netromd, it also needs valid ax25 ports in /etc/ax25/nrbroadcast
73 de Bernard, f6bvp
-------------
Hi all!
I have been experimenting with 3 computers as AX.25 nodes in a home LAN,
as follows:
_____________ ___________________ __________________
VHF |MS DOS 5 comp| |MS Windows XP comp| |MS Windows XP comp|
TRX--TNC2--| BPQ 4.09d | -- | BPQ32 4.10f |--| BPQ32 4.10f |
ant ------------- ------------------ ------------------
(1) (2) (3)
In the situation above all 3 nodes talk to each other without problems.
What I wanted to do was to replace comps (2) and (3) with Linux nodes.
Both of those comps are dual-boot: (2) is Debian 6.0.1a, and (3) is
Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS.
Ok so I installed libax, ax25tools and ax25apps, as well as node on both
(2) and (3) by using Synaptic but am not able to activate the nodes
properly. In fact, I have edited the main files in /etc/ax25 on both
machines according to the ancient AX.25-howto and then tried the
following commands in Ubuntu terminal (in Debian root terminal of course
without 'sudo'):
sudo modprobe bpqether (did not complain anything)
sudo /sbin/ifconfig bpq0 hw ax25 yt7mpb-15 up (did not complain either)
sudo ifconfig responded with:
bpq0 Link encap:AMPR AX.25 HWaddr YT7MPB-15
UP RUNNING MTU:256 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:25:22:3d:9f:22
inet addr:192.168.0.4 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::225:22ff:fe3d:9f22/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:116 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:125 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:1
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:12824 (12.8 KB) TX bytes:11360 (11.3 KB)
Interrupt:27
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:15 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:15 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:957 (957.0 B) TX bytes:957 (957.0 B)
sudo modprobe netrom (did not complain)
sudo nrattach netrom responded with:
NET/ROM port netrom bound to device nr0
sudo nrattach netnod responded with:
NET/ROM port netnod bound to device nr1
sudo ax25d responded with:
axconfig: port bpq0 not active
ax25d: no AX.25 port data configured
sudo netromd
axconfig: port bpq0 not active
netromd: no AX.25 ports defined
I suppose that I mis-configured and/or forgotten some important steps
and would like to contact somebody with more experience with Linux nodes
running over Ethernet. Btw, at the moment I do not plan to run any RF
ports on those Linux machines - just to have netrom nodes on them so
that those nodes should be able to talk with the dos computer (1), and
probably later I will add LinFBB to replace the WinFBB's that run over
BPQ32 nodes when (2) and (3) are booted as Win XP.
Regards,
Misko YT7MPB
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-09 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-09 21:27 Bernard F6BVP [this message]
2011-07-10 22:18 ` Linux nodes instead of BPQ32 nodes in the LAN Miroslav Skoric
2011-07-15 15:08 ` Bernard Pidoux F6BVP
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-06 19:08 Miroslav Skoric
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E18C7BC.60400@free.fr \
--to=f6bvp@free.fr \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skoric@EUnet.rs \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.