Re: 0.31

[Fyodor Ustinov <ufm@ufm.su>]

On 07/11/2011 12:36 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Fyodor Ustinov wrote:
>> On 07/11/2011 12:12 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>>> Hmm, yeah the 'loaded dup inode' messages should never happen.  They
>>> appear to be just files, though, not directories, so you can safely ignore
>>> them.  The namespace repair will need to clean that up at some point. The
>>> recursive rstat errors you saw are probably just fallout from that, and
>>> can also be ignored.
>> I understand it correctly, that until not  implemented the Feature # 86 I have
>> no way to fix this?
> Right.  Well, this is going to come incrementally.  We'll have a namespace
> scan that fixes some basic issues before there is a full-blown robust
> repair tool.
ok, I'll be waiting impatiently.

> :) Okay.  We're putting locking specific tests in place before trying to
> reproduce #1150 with Amanda, BTW.  It sounds like we need an amanda-like
> workload though anyway, given the issues you're seeing.  How old is this
> fs?  How many times has it been upgraded?
fs has been created not later 2011-06-09.

I'm not sure that I understand correctly "fs upgraded", but cluster 
upgraded to each new ceph versions. I.e. 0.29 -> 0.29.1 -> 0.30 -> 0.31

WBR,
     Fyodor.