From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>
Subject: Re: Splitting trigger header in two and barriers.
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:08:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E1B2001.2030409@cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E1B1BF9.4000707@cam.ac.uk>
On 07/11/11 16:51, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The trigger.h file merges elements I'd really rather were separate.
> There are some parts that belong to drivers acting as consumers
> and others to those acting as producers of triggers.
> In a few cases (e.g. lis3l02dq_ring.c) the consumer and trigger
> are in the same file, but in many others the driver only supports
> one or the other or has them in separate source files.
>
> The main block to this bit of reorganization ist that some drivers
> explicitly put the trigger and detach from it in their 'ring cleanup'
> functions (see ad7298_ring.c ad7298_ring_cleanup.)
>
> My original intent was that if a trigger had not been detached from
> in userspace, it would not be possible to remmove the driver, so
> no cleanup would occur. (basically it counts as being 'in use').
>
> Is there a usecase that demands this explicity disconnect, or
> is it simply a case that the reference counting is going wrong
> somewhere and hence this was needed in the drivers?
>
> Failing a good description of why this is there in these drivers,
> I'd like to clean it out. Will give us a much easier to follow
> interface for the triggers.
oops, just noticed I did this first in max1363. Will hammer that hard
and see whether everything works as I think it should!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-11 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-11 15:51 Splitting trigger header in two and barriers Jonathan Cameron
2011-07-11 16:08 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2011-07-11 16:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E1B2001.2030409@cam.ac.uk \
--to=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.