From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?U8OpYmFzdGllbiBSaWNjaW8=?= Subject: Re: xm/xl block-detach issue Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:37:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4E1B6CFC.9050209@swisscenter.com> References: <4E186702.6050601@swisscenter.com> <4E188FC3.1010009@swisscenter.com> <1310288759.2685.356.camel@ramone> <4E19961F.9070109@swisscenter.com> <1310321977.2685.370.camel@ramone> <4E1B2E5C.2020402@swisscenter.com> <1310408578.14003.78.camel@agari.van.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1310408578.14003.78.camel@agari.van.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Daniel Stodden Cc: "dmeyer@cs.ubc.ca" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 11.07.2011 20:22, Daniel Stodden wrote: > Looks good, although I'm not really good with the 'disk' lines either.=20 > E.g. mine just say tap:aio, tap:vhd, etc. Hmm what is the difference betwwen tap:vhd and tap2:vhd ? If I start my vm1 using tap:vhd it does not hangs on a "ps -aux" in the=20 dom0, and the xl block-list 0 doesn't segfault, but it does if I use=20 tap2:vhd. I'm a bit confused. There is blktap and blktap2 in the xen sources, but=20 one module blktap for the kernel. The same module is used for both=20 versions ? > Ouch. What xen tree are you running? Unstable? What does tap-ctl list=20 > say, does that work? You might want to try the 4.1 tree instead. If=20 > not, you'll at least want to get yourself a coredump to get an idea of=20 > what you're after. I'm running 4.1.1 from the tar.gz, also tried 4.1.0, same things occurs.=20 I'm still investigating :) S=C3=A9bastien