From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgkZ3-0002HG-Q9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:32:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgkZ2-0000by-Cf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:32:21 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:65287) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgkZ2-0000bu-5Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:32:20 -0400 Received: by qwj8 with SMTP id 8so3577308qwj.4 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:32:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <4E1CBD60.1000709@twiddle.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:32:16 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8AA1C177-82E3-4783-96C6-A3728A097872@suse.de> <4E1C93D1.8030409@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Loading ELF binaries with very high base addresses List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Prashant Vaibhav Cc: Alexander Graf , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 07/12/2011 01:58 PM, Prashant Vaibhav wrote: > Yes, exactly what happened when loading a non-trivial binary. :-( > Oh well. If you've got an ia64 cross-compiler, you could still make progress on qemu by building your own binaries and linking them somewhere convenient in the low 64 TB. r~