From: Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com>
To: Netfilter <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>, Andrew Beverley <andy@andybev.com>
Subject: Possible conntrack/kernel bug - not catching certain ICMP packets
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:45:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E202844.30602@wildgooses.com> (raw)
Hi, This is related to a previous thread, but more complete problem
statement below:
I notice that I can get an ICMP packet to bypass parts of conntrack
under the following conditions
- Send a UDP packet that triggers some kind of UDP reply
- Close the listening UDP socket before that reply arrives
- Kernel generates an ICMP unreachable response which does not appear to
be tracked (as expected) by conntrack
Tested with kernel 2.6.38.4 + iptables 1.4.11.1
Reproduce this easily like so:
nslookup www.yahoo.co.uk 8.8.8.8 & sleep 0.001 && killall nslookup
(where the sleep obviously needs to be smaller than your DNS RTT
lookup time. Obviously substitute nslookup/dig as appropriate...)
My results
# conntrack -E
[NEW] udp 17 30 src=10.141.86.7 dst=8.8.8.8 sport=60721
dport=53 [UNREPLIED] src=8.8.8.8 dst=10.141.86.7 sport=53 dport=60721
[UPDATE] udp 17 29 src=10.141.86.7 dst=8.8.8.8 sport=60721
dport=53 src=8.8.8.8 dst=10.141.86.7 sport=53 dport=60721
[DESTROY] udp 17 src=10.141.86.7 dst=8.8.8.8 sport=60721 dport=53
packets=1 bytes=66 src=8.8.8.8 dst=10.141.86.7 sport=53 dport=60721
packets=1 bytes=110
# tcpdump
11:26:35.072564 IP 10.141.86.7.60721 > 8.8.8.8.domain: 2+ PTR?
8.8.8.8.in-addr.arpa. (38)
11:26:35.351804 IP 8.8.8.8.domain > 10.141.86.7.60721: 2 1/0/0 PTR
google-public-dns-a.google.com. (82)
11:26:35.352110 IP 10.141.86.7 > 8.8.8.8: ICMP 10.141.86.7 udp port
60721 unreachable, length 118
# iptables -A OUTPUT -j LOGMARK
# iptables -A OUTPUT -j LOG
Jul 15 11:26:35 localhost kern.warn kernel: [ 6676.964396] iif=0
hook=OUTPUT nfmark=0x0 secmark=0x0 classify=0x0 ctdir=ORIGINAL
ct=0xcf3d5060 ctmark=0x0 ctstate=NEW ctstatus= lifetime=6346s
Jul 15 11:26:35 localhost kern.warn kernel: [ 6676.964396] IN= OUT=ppp1
SRC=10.141.86.7 DST=8.8.8.8 LEN=66 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=19971 DF
PROTO=UDP SPT=60721 DPT=53 LEN=46
Jul 15 11:26:35 localhost kern.warn kernel: [ 6677.249312] iif=0
hook=OUTPUT nfmark=0x0 secmark=0x0 classify=0x0 ctdir=ORIGINAL
ct=0xcf3d5060 ctmark=0x0 ctstate=RELATED ctstatus=SEEN_REPLY,CONFIRMED
lifetime=4294937s
Jul 15 11:26:35 localhost kern.warn kernel: [ 6677.249426] IN= OUT=ppp1
SRC=10.141.86.7 DST=8.8.8.8 LEN=138 TOS=0x00 PREC=0xC0 TTL=64 ID=18412
PROTO=ICMP TYPE=3 CODE=3 [SRC=8.8.8.8 DST=10.141.86.7 LEN=110 TOS=0x00
PREC=0x00 TTL=46 ID=3897 PROTO=UDP SPT=53 DPT=60721 LEN=90
Notice that logmark seems to show that the ctstatus on the ICMP packet
is SEEN_REPLY, but conntrack -E shows only packets=1? tcpdump shows
that the ICMP packet did indeed go out
Could someone with more knowledge of conntrack please investigate further?
Thanks
Ed W
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-15 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-15 11:45 Ed W [this message]
2011-07-18 11:36 ` Possible conntrack/kernel bug - not catching certain ICMP packets Ed W
2011-07-18 12:16 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-07-20 21:45 ` Ed W
2011-07-21 6:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-07-21 8:43 ` Ed W
2011-07-21 9:14 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-07-25 23:45 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-07-26 13:00 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E202844.30602@wildgooses.com \
--to=lists@wildgooses.com \
--cc=andy@andybev.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.