From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dv@vollmann.ch (Detlef Vollmann) Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:47:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/7] at91: remove non used at91_spi.h In-Reply-To: <1310687525-22486-4-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> References: <1310687525-22486-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <1310687525-22486-4-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Message-ID: <4E2028E1.1060603@vollmann.ch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Sorry, I couldn't find a summary message for this patch series, so I picked this one to reply, because this one hurts me most. On 07/15/11 01:52, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > Cc: Nicolas Ferre > --- > arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_spi.h | 81 ---------------------------- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_spi.h [...] First, I'm actually using mach/at91_spi.h in an SPI slave driver. And I'm using arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_spi.h instead of drivers/spi/atmel_spi.h (which still exists in the kernel version we use here), because arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_spi.h is accessible from an out-of-tree driver w/o extra effort. And this applies to all all of those header files, so I'm really against all patches in this series. Detlef