From: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
To: Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: standard performance (write speed 20Mb/s)
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:04:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E23F736.30601@anonymous.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110717132833.GC2614@teal.hq.k1024.org>
On 17/07/2011 14:28, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 01:51:11PM +0100, John Robinson wrote:
[...]
>> doesn't work in magic sizes, so we should be using a more realistic
>> benchmarking tool like bonnie++.
>
> Honestly, I don't find bonnie++ a realistic tool. fio is a much better
> one; bonnie is quite old and inflexible.
Ah OK, yes I agree with you there, but my general point remains: dd
might be OK for producing one very specific metric in some cases, but
that will not give a realistic impression of real use performance, so we
should be using a more realistic benchmarking tool.
Cheers,
John.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-18 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-16 19:40 standard performance (write speed 20Mb/s) Pol Hallen
2011-07-17 4:26 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-17 8:12 ` Pol Hallen
2011-07-17 12:11 ` John Robinson
2011-07-17 12:22 ` Iustin Pop
2011-07-17 12:51 ` John Robinson
2011-07-17 13:28 ` Iustin Pop
2011-07-18 9:04 ` John Robinson [this message]
2011-07-17 22:05 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-27 5:42 ` Simon Matthews
2011-07-27 5:46 ` Roman Mamedov
2011-07-27 10:22 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-27 10:26 ` John Robinson
2011-07-27 12:35 ` Joe Landman
2011-07-27 13:54 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-17 23:03 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-18 11:52 ` Pol Hallen
2011-07-21 17:07 ` standard performance (write speed ??Mb/s) - new raid5 array Pol Hallen
2011-07-22 0:05 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-22 7:08 ` Pol Hallen
2011-07-22 8:13 ` Erwan Leroux
2011-07-17 16:48 ` standard performance (write speed 20Mb/s) Gordon Henderson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-18 12:03 Pol Hallen
2011-07-20 12:31 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-20 20:02 ` Pol Hallen
[not found] ` <CADNH=7HR7euaWem0tpLxJfRe0hYnRP5fwxJ6MC5vJeNf=T=PzA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-07-21 0:02 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-21 6:57 ` Mathias Burén
2011-07-21 8:55 ` Erwan Leroux
2011-07-21 15:06 ` Paweł Brodacki
2011-07-21 15:30 ` Erwan Leroux
2011-07-21 15:42 ` Erwan Leroux
2011-07-25 6:39 ` Paweł Brodacki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E23F736.30601@anonymous.org.uk \
--to=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.