From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aneesh V Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:24:06 +0530 Subject: [U-Boot] OMAP3 SPL: merge window question In-Reply-To: References: <20110718082935.GB3867@Zitronenbaum> <4E23F307.7000105@aribaud.net> <20110718113124.GA3183@Zitronenbaum> <4E242306.1000007@aribaud.net> <20110718123017.91A1217A3205@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4E24490E.3040603@ti.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Daniel, Wolfgang, On Monday 18 July 2011 07:49 PM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote: > Dear Wolfgang, > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Albert ARIBAUD, >> >> In message<4E242306.1000007@aribaud.net> you wrote: >>> >>> What might bother *you*, however, is that ATM the SPL framework patches >>> are RFC, so they won't be applied as such, and Aneesh's OMAP4 patches >>> are not applied yet. And you need those patches applied for yours to be. >>> But if it *does* happen, I am fine with it. :) >> >> I hope we see a final version of these patches very soon, and I am >> willing to pull these into the upcoming release. > > so can I or shall I resend the whole SPL series with the subject > changed to "[PATCH v3 N/M]"? > > Do you have any comments on patch "[RFC PATCH v2 2/9] spl: add initial > support for a generic SPL" > where I added the requested documentation? > Probably one more small change is required in 2/9. CONFIG_SYS_SPL_LDSCRIPT needs to be CONFIG_SPL_LDSCRIPT for the sake of consistency. br, Aneesh