From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MMIO: Make coalesced mmio use a device per zone
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:57:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E256301.1040700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311071471-15546-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com>
On 07/19/2011 01:31 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> This patch changes coalesced mmio to create one mmio device per
> zone instead of handling all zones in one device.
>
> Doing so enables us to take advantage of existing locking and prevents
> a race condition between coalesced mmio registration/unregistration
> and lookups.
>
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *kvm_vcpu_cache;
> */
> struct kvm_io_bus {
> int dev_count;
> -#define NR_IOBUS_DEVS 200
> +#define NR_IOBUS_DEVS 300
> struct kvm_io_device *devs[NR_IOBUS_DEVS];
> };
This means that a lot of non-coalesced-mmio users can squeeze out
coalesced-mmio. I don't know if it's really worthwhile, but the 100
coalesced mmio slots should be reserved so we are guaranteed they are
available.
>
> @@ -95,6 +85,8 @@ static void coalesced_mmio_destructor(struct kvm_io_device *this)
> {
> struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev = to_mmio(this);
>
> + list_del(&dev->list);
> +
> kfree(dev);
> }
>
No lock?
> int kvm_vm_ioctl_unregister_coalesced_mmio(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_zone *zone)
> {
> - int i;
> - struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev = kvm->coalesced_mmio_dev;
> - struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_zone *z;
> -
> - if (dev == NULL)
> - return -ENXIO;
> + struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev;
>
> mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>
> - i = dev->nb_zones;
> - while (i) {
> - z =&dev->zone[i - 1];
> -
> - /* unregister all zones
> - * included in (zone->addr, zone->size)
> - */
> -
> - if (zone->addr<= z->addr&&
> - z->addr + z->size<= zone->addr + zone->size) {
> - dev->nb_zones--;
> - *z = dev->zone[dev->nb_zones];
> + list_for_each_entry(dev,&kvm->coalesced_zones.items, list)
> + if (coalesced_mmio_in_range(dev, zone->addr, zone->size)) {
> + kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS,&dev->dev);
> + kvm_iodevice_destructor(&dev->dev);
> }
> - i--;
> - }
No lock?
>
> struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev {
> + struct list_head list;
> struct kvm_io_device dev;
> struct kvm *kvm;
> - spinlock_t lock;
> - int nb_zones;
> - struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_zone zone[KVM_COALESCED_MMIO_ZONE_MAX];
> + struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_zone zone;
> };
>
Why a list instead of a linear array?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-19 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-19 10:31 [PATCH v2] MMIO: Make coalesced mmio use a device per zone Sasha Levin
2011-07-19 10:57 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-07-19 11:05 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-19 12:24 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-19 12:34 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-19 12:39 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-21 9:12 ` Amos Kong
2012-02-13 2:06 ` Amos Kong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E256301.1040700@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.