From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Frediano Ziglio <freddy77@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] coroutines and block I/O considerations
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:15:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E258383.6040609@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E255823.8080502@redhat.com>
On 07/19/2011 05:10 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 19.07.2011 10:06, schrieb Frediano Ziglio:
> They are still all running in the same thread.
>
>> 2- memory considerations on coroutines. Beside coroutines allow more
>> readable code I wonder if somebody considered memory. For every
>> coroutines a different stack has to be allocated. For instance
>> ucontext and win32 implementation use 4mb. Assuming 128 concurrent AIO
>> this require about 512mb of ram (mostly only committed but not used
>> and coroutines are reused).
>
> 128 concurrent requests is a lot. And even then, it's only virtual
> memory. I doubt that we're actually using much more than we do in the
> old code with the AIOCBs (which will disappear and become local
> variables when we complete the conversion).
A 4mb stack is probably overkill anyway. It's easiest to just start
with a large stack and then once all of the functionality is worked out,
optimize to a smaller stack.
The same problem exists with using threads FWIW since the default thread
stack is usually quite large.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-19 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-19 8:06 [Qemu-devel] coroutines and block I/O considerations Frediano Ziglio
2011-07-19 10:10 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-07-19 10:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-07-25 8:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-07-25 10:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-07-19 13:15 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E258383.6040609@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=freddy77@gmail.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.