From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden <groen692@grosc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20 of 20] n2 MSR handling and	capability
	exposure
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:59:32 +0200
Message-ID: <4E258DC4.4050106@grosc.com>
References: <patchbomb.1307607905@nest-wsm.los-vmm.org>
	<480cfcea095bddb2e7c4.1307607925@nest-wsm.los-vmm.org>
	<20110613082700.GA17634@whitby.uk.xensource.com>
	<1A42CE6F5F474C41B63392A5F80372B2562BF1EC@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<20110615124527.GG17634@whitby.uk.xensource.com>
	<4DFEE946.9070603@grosc.com> <4E0C84C8.1030804@grosc.com>
	<20110701090145.GS9784@whitby.uk.xensource.com>
	<4E0D9948.5000508@amd.com> <4E0D9D48.20308@grosc.com>
	<20110704085810.GZ17634@whitby.uk.xensource.com>
	<4E16ADD9.4060304@grosc.com>
	<1A42CE6F5F474C41B63392A5F80372B212DAB9DD82@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <1A42CE6F5F474C41B63392A5F80372B212DAB9DD82@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Cc: "Christoph.Egger@amd.com" <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hi eddie, I use the same settings. however my setup becomes in-response 
after start of the second nested kvm quest. were does that leave us? 
Should I make some trace and sent it to you. I can give you access to my 
system as well if you want. just give me your thoughts on how to move 
forward.

mfg,
Jeroen.

Op 18-7-2011 17:41, Dong, Eddie schreef:
> Jeroen:
> 	Sorry for later response.
> 	I did a double check locally, I was able to create 2 layer 2 guests. My environment is L1 guest: 64 bits Linux 2.6.25 + KVM-76. One L2 guest is 32 bits Linux, another one is 64 bits guest.
> 	For layer 1 guest, I am setting:
>
> hap=1
> nestedhvm = 1
>
> Thx, Eddie
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>