From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Romanick Subject: Re: 915GME support Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:40:37 -0700 Message-ID: <4E25CFA5.2070600@freedesktop.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from expn.cat.pdx.edu (expn.cat.pdx.edu [131.252.208.110]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0A59E81E for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:40:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Terumichi Sadahiro Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/14/2011 01:52 PM, Terumichi Sadahiro wrote: > I can't find any description about 915GME (not 915GM) in > intellinuxgraphics.org at all. > Does this device have so little demand for, or is there any problem? There are a lot of different variations of the "same" chip out there. My guess is that 915GME and 915GM are the same except perhaps clock, memory support, or CPU support. Looking at the chipset comparison (http://ark.intel.com/compare/27715,32279), it seems the primary difference is the 915GM has TV out and the 915GME does not. The 915GME also has "embedded options available," whatever that means. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk4lz6EACgkQX1gOwKyEAw+BrQCgiBtT86rArd3Nj0YlNDr+3j/E Z+MAn0K/2mw8x3rzaF/m69IQfAGogHpT =7JZW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----