From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MMIO: Make coalesced mmio use a device per zone
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:24:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E2690B5.9050206@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E25BD8D.1030509@siemens.com>
On 07/19/2011 08:23 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-07-19 19:17, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 07/19/2011 08:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>
> >> Another improvement - unfortunately less transparent for user space -
> >> would be to overcome the single ring buffer that forces us to hold a
> >> central lock in user space while processing the entries. We rather need
> >> per-device rings. While waiting for coalesced VGA MMIO being processed,
> >> way too many kittens are killed.
> >>
> >> I have this on our agenda, but I wouldn't be disappointed as well if
> >> someone else is faster.
> >
> > The socket mmio would have accomplished this as well.
>
> I haven't followed the outcome in all details - is that approach dead
> due to its complexity?
>
> > One thing to
> > beware of is to preserve correctness:
> >
> > 1) write to 0xa0000 (queued)
> > 2) write to 0xa0002 (queued)
> > 3) remap 0xa0000 region (executed)
>
> Obviously, there must be 3a) here: drain all affected queues.
How do you implement this 3a, if your consumers are outside the main
process? I guess you could have an additional synchonize API (for
in-kernel consumers) or RPC (for external process consumers), but then
this is no longer a simple API.
> > 4) write to 0xa000 (queued)
> > 5) drain queue
> >
> > writes 1 and 2 go to the wrong place.
> >
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-20 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-19 8:10 [PATCH] MMIO: Make coalesced mmio use a device per zone Sasha Levin
2011-07-19 8:48 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-19 9:53 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-19 9:59 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-19 10:17 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-19 10:32 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-19 11:22 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-19 11:45 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-19 17:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-07-19 17:17 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-19 17:23 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-07-19 19:28 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-19 20:00 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-07-20 8:24 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-07-20 8:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-07-20 8:52 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-20 8:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-07-20 8:58 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E2690B5.9050206@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.