From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone suspend array V2.0
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:57:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E2716EF.1050509@nexgo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110516200857.3a009a64@notabene.brown>
Hi Neil,
sorry for the very late answer.
On 05/16/2011 12:08 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:15:15 +0200 Piergiorgio Sartor
> <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> reminder for the suspend patch.
>>
>> Thank you so much for the code review.
>>
>> I modified it in order to fix, hopefully, all the flaws.
>>
>> New patch attached below.
>>
>> Please note that "sigblock()" cannot be used, since it is
>> declared, at least on my system, as "deprecated".
>> Furthermore, I noticed that "Grow.c" is not checking the
>> return value of "sysfs_set_num()" while suspending the
>> array, maybe you'll need to look at this.
>>
>> Finally, please check the new patch too, while I can
>> confirm the software is doing what is supposed to do,
>> I still need support in order to confirm the suspend
>> and resume code.
>>
>> Thanks again for your help, again let me know what
>> is the next expected step.
>
> That all looks fine thank. I've applied it and pushed it out.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean exactly by the 'next expected step'...
Well, is there anything than should be done, like
documentation or code cleanup?
At the moment, it seems to me, the check itself it is
fine, maybe performance is not at best (anyone wants
to help, here?).
So, I was thinking about the "repair" process, that is
fixing the chunks which seem corrupted, instead of just
the parity.
Before I go that way, I would like to close pending issues,
if any, with the actual software.
Thanks,
bye,
pg
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
>
>>
>> bye,
>>
>> --- cut here ---
>>
>> diff -uNr a/raid6check.c b/raid6check.c
>> --- a/raid6check.c 2011-05-07 20:35:18.693370007 +0200
>> +++ b/raid6check.c 2011-05-09 20:32:14.551695036 +0200
>> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
>>
>> #include "mdadm.h"
>> #include <stdint.h>
>> +#include <signal.h>
>> +#include <sys/mman.h>
>>
>> int geo_map(int block, unsigned long long stripe, int raid_disks,
>> int level, int layout);
>> @@ -99,7 +101,7 @@
>> return curr_broken_disk;
>> }
>>
>> -int check_stripes(int *source, unsigned long long *offsets,
>> +int check_stripes(struct mdinfo *info, int *source, unsigned long long *offsets,
>> int raid_disks, int chunk_size, int level, int layout,
>> unsigned long long start, unsigned long long length, char *name[])
>> {
>> @@ -115,6 +117,8 @@
>> int diskP, diskQ;
>> int data_disks = raid_disks - 2;
>> int err = 0;
>> + sighandler_t sig[3];
>> + int rv;
>>
>> extern int tables_ready;
>>
>> @@ -139,10 +143,35 @@
>>
>> printf("pos --> %llu\n", start);
>>
>> + if(mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE) != 0) {
>> + err = 2;
>> + goto exitCheck;
>> + }
>> + sig[0] = signal(SIGTERM, SIG_IGN);
>> + sig[1] = signal(SIGINT, SIG_IGN);
>> + sig[2] = signal(SIGQUIT, SIG_IGN);
>> + rv = sysfs_set_num(info, NULL, "suspend_lo", start * chunk_size * data_disks);
>> + rv |= sysfs_set_num(info, NULL, "suspend_hi", (start + 1) * chunk_size * data_disks);
>> for (i = 0 ; i < raid_disks ; i++) {
>> lseek64(source[i], offsets[i] + start * chunk_size, 0);
>> read(source[i], stripes[i], chunk_size);
>> }
>> + rv |= sysfs_set_num(info, NULL, "suspend_lo", 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL);
>> + rv |= sysfs_set_num(info, NULL, "suspend_hi", 0);
>> + rv |= sysfs_set_num(info, NULL, "suspend_lo", 0);
>> + signal(SIGQUIT, sig[2]);
>> + signal(SIGINT, sig[1]);
>> + signal(SIGTERM, sig[0]);
>> + if(munlockall() != 0) {
>> + err = 3;
>> + goto exitCheck;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if(rv != 0) {
>> + err = rv * 256;
>> + goto exitCheck;
>> + }
>> +
>> for (i = 0 ; i < data_disks ; i++) {
>> int disk = geo_map(i, start, raid_disks, level, layout);
>> blocks[i] = stripes[disk];
>> @@ -214,7 +243,7 @@
>> unsigned long long start, length;
>> int i;
>> int mdfd;
>> - struct mdinfo *info, *comp;
>> + struct mdinfo *info = NULL, *comp = NULL;
>> char *err = NULL;
>> int exit_err = 0;
>> int close_flag = 0;
>> @@ -250,6 +279,12 @@
>> GET_OFFSET|
>> GET_SIZE);
>>
>> + if(info == NULL) {
>> + fprintf(stderr, "%s: Error reading sysfs information of %s\n", prg, argv[1]);
>> + exit_err = 9;
>> + goto exitHere;
>> + }
>> +
>> if(info->array.level != level) {
>> fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s not a RAID-6\n", prg, argv[1]);
>> exit_err = 3;
>> @@ -343,7 +378,7 @@
>> comp = comp->next;
>> }
>>
>> - int rv = check_stripes(fds, offsets,
>> + int rv = check_stripes(info, fds, offsets,
>> raid_disks, chunk_size, level, layout,
>> start, length, disk_name);
>> if (rv != 0) {
>>
>> --- cut here ---
>>
>> bye,
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
piergiorgio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-20 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-21 20:45 [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-03-07 19:33 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-03-21 3:02 ` NeilBrown
2011-03-21 10:40 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-03-21 11:04 ` NeilBrown
2011-03-21 11:54 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-03-21 22:59 ` NeilBrown
2011-03-31 18:53 ` [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone md device Piergiorgio Sartor
[not found] ` <4D96597C.1020103@tuxes.nl>
[not found] ` <20110402071310.GA2640@lazy.lzy>
2011-04-02 10:33 ` Bas van Schaik
2011-04-02 11:03 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-04-04 23:01 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-05 19:56 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-04-04 17:52 ` [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone code cleanup Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-04-04 23:12 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-06 18:02 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-04-13 20:48 ` [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone fix component list parsing Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-04-14 7:29 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-14 7:32 ` [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone code cleanup NeilBrown
2011-05-08 18:54 ` [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone suspend array Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-05-09 1:45 ` NeilBrown
2011-05-09 18:43 ` [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone suspend array V2.0 Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-05-15 21:15 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-05-16 10:08 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-20 17:57 ` Piergiorgio Sartor [this message]
2011-07-22 6:41 ` Luca Berra
2011-07-25 18:53 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-07-26 5:25 ` NeilBrown
2011-08-07 17:09 ` [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone man page Piergiorgio Sartor
2011-08-09 0:43 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E2716EF.1050509@nexgo.de \
--to=piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.