From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (hermes.mlbassoc.com [64.234.241.98]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15154C800A1 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:00:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 999) id 3CEFE16603F5; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:00:42 -0600 (MDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9C816603EF; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:00:41 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4E287759.3050806@mlbassoc.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:00:41 -0600 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poky Project Subject: meta-toolchain question X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:00:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit When I build the meta-toolchain for my armv5te target, I see some confusing paths. For example, why is the environment script named /opt/poky/1.00+snapshot/environment-setup-armv5te-poky-linux-gnueabi but the sysroot is named /opt/poky/1.00+snapshot/sysroots/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi Why isn't it /opt/poky/1.00+snapshot/sysroots/armv5te-poky-linux-gnueabi I even see some stranger paths, like these /opt/poky/1.00+snapshot/sysroots/i686-pokysdk-linux/usr/lib/armv5te-poky-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi I would think it should be armv5te-poky-linux-gnueabi everywhere. If I wanted to also have a meta-toolchain for armv7a, there would be a clash since they both use the same sysroots. Note: I sort of asked this question yesterday and the answer was "use ADT". I don't see that ADT will solve this and I also find ADT much to heavyweight for my customers who just want a simple toolchain that matches their Poky-built system. Thanks -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------