From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Emelyanov Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] clone: Introduce the CLONE_CHILD_USEPID functionality Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:09:02 +0400 Message-ID: <4E2A819E.1090103@parallels.com> References: <4E204466.8010204@parallels.com> <4E2044EB.20001@parallels.com> <20110721160459.GD19012@mail.hallyn.com> <20110722230848.GB16940@count0.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110722230848.GB16940-52DBMbEzqgQ/wnmkkaCWp/UQ3DHhIser@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Matt Helsley Cc: Glauber Costa , Cyrill Gorcunov , Tejun Heo , Nathan Lynch , "Eric W. Biederman" , Linux Containers , Daniel Lezcano List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org > So I think it would be better to incorporate the eclone patch set > unless, as you say, Pavel can see a good reason not to. I'm perfectly fine with using the eclone approach. This particular patch was included in the set just because the tools use one. I will switch to using eclone next iteration. > Cheers, > -Matt Helsley