From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qkefi-0006Hz-Sv for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 18:03:23 +0200 Received: (qmail 23020 invoked by uid 1003); 23 Jul 2011 15:59:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.167?) (philip@opensdr.com@96.240.162.216) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 23 Jul 2011 15:59:12 -0000 Message-ID: <4E2AEFCE.7060406@balister.org> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 11:59:10 -0400 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110621 Fedora/3.1.11-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1307648104-24260-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <4E29B25D.8030503@balister.org> <20110722202113.GA19631@sakrah.homelinux.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc: Package libstdc++ gdb python helpers into dev package X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 16:03:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/23/2011 11:09 AM, Chris Verges wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On (22/07/11 13:24), Philip Balister wrote: >>> On 06/09/2011 03:35 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> People are seeing these errrors from ldconfig >>>> libstdc++.so.6.0.14-gdb.py is not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic >>>> bytes at the start. >>> >>> No more annoying message when I run ldconfig. Getting this fix in >>> will reduce my support emails by a small, but noticeable amount. >> >> thanks for testing it out. I have installed in in oe.dev/master > > Would it be worth a cherry-pick of this into 2011.03-maintenance? > I've been seeing it there with gcc 4.4.4, too, and have the same issue > with questions that pop up about it. I'm going to look at this "soon". Philip