From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751901Ab1GZNER (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:04:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.30]:43307 "EHLO mx1.fusionio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751387Ab1GZNEL (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:04:11 -0400 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1311685449-03d6a510aa1d7030001-xx1T2L X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: JAxboe@fusionio.com Message-ID: <4E2EBB46.6060108@fusionio.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:04:06 +0200 From: Jens Axboe MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ming Lei CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: block: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code References: <4E2E4FF1.1010103@fusionio.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: block: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: mail1.int.fusionio.com[10.101.1.21] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1311685449 X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.101.1.180:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.70020 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2011-07-26 08:22, Ming Lei wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 2011-07-26 06:49, Ming Lei wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> The bug is observed in -next-20110725, follows the stack trace[1], and >>> seems the attachment patch can fix the bug. >> >> Does this work, too? We don't necessarily need the CPU stable, but >> spewing debug output isn't very nice. > > This does work, thanks, Great, thanks for reporting and testing. -- Jens Axboe