Re: [patch] fs: add missing unlock in default_llseek()

[Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>]

On 07/26/2011 10:25 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 
> A recent change in linux-next, 982d816581 "fs: add SEEK_HOLE and
> SEEK_DATA flags" added some direct returns on error, but it should
> have been a goto out.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> index 5907b49..179f1c3 100644
> --- a/fs/read_write.c
> +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> @@ -166,8 +166,10 @@ loff_t default_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
>  			 * long as offset isn't at the end of the file then the
>  			 * offset is data.
>  			 */
> -			if (offset >= inode->i_size)
> -				return -ENXIO;
> +			if (offset >= inode->i_size) {
> +				retval = -ENXIO;
> +				goto out;
> +			}
>  			break;
>  		case SEEK_HOLE:
>  			/*
> @@ -175,8 +177,10 @@ loff_t default_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
>  			 * as long as offset isn't i_size or larger, return
>  			 * i_size.
>  			 */
> -			if (offset >= inode->i_size)
> -				return -ENXIO;
> +			if (offset >= inode->i_size) {
> +				retval = -ENXIO;
> +				goto out;
> +			}
>  			offset = inode->i_size;
>  			break;
>  	}

Eeek copy+paste bites me again.  Thanks

Acked-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>