From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from goalie.tycho.ncsc.mil (goalie [144.51.3.250]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p6QIAFJg016961 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:10:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msux-gh1-uea02.nsa.gov (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id p6QIADPQ013670 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:10:14 GMT Message-ID: <4E2F0303.1040909@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:10:11 -0400 From: Daniel J Walsh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Lawrence CC: SELinux Subject: Re: Bumping Version Numbers References: <4E2EDD81.8080608@tresys.com> In-Reply-To: <4E2EDD81.8080608@tresys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/26/2011 11:30 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > A while ago ago we discussed bumping the minor version number and > resetting the revision version number when we do a release [1]. We > are now preparing for a release and wanted some feedback before we > bumped the version numbers. > > We're thinking of only bumping minor version numbers if the revision > version number is non-zero. > > So the version numbers will become: > > checkpolicy-2.1.0 libselinux-2.1.0 libsepol-2.1.0 libsemanage-2.1.0 > policycoreutils-2.1.0 sepolgen-1.1.0 > > We could alternatively always bump minor version numbers even if the > revision number was zero (i.e. no changes since the last release). > This has the advantange that all releases share the same version > number. If we do that, it might make sense to bump sepolgen to 2.1.0 > this release as well, unless there is some significance between 1.x > and 2.x with sepolgen. > > Thoughts? > > - Steve > > [1] http://marc.info/?t=129962368300001&r=1&w=2 > > -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing > list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to > majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without > quotes as the message. > > This looks fine to us. We don't ship them simultaneously. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk4vAwMACgkQrlYvE4MpobNOOACfeW1e51lFqKKudbqDfWAU9OEP OWUAoMQ4Wg06WvdkUrmcx8UqxEwdUj6k =+tCX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.