From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <holger@freyther.de>
Received: from gandharva.secretlabs.de (gandharva.secretlabs.de
	[78.46.147.237])
	by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD584C800A1
	for <poky@yoctoproject.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:15:51 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.101] (91-64-80-26-dynip.superkabel.de [91.64.80.26])
	by gandharva.secretlabs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7CB51B10C0E;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:25:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4E300F85.6030800@freyther.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:15:49 +0200
From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther <holger@freyther.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
References: <4E3008DA.8090401@freyther.de>
	<201107271401.47256.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
	<4E300DC0.9080507@freyther.de>
	<201107271413.58661.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <201107271413.58661.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: Another story of a non upstream user of poky
X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion <poky.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/poky>,
	<mailto:poky-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky>
List-Post: <mailto:poky@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:poky-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky>,
	<mailto:poky-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:15:51 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 07/27/2011 03:13 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 July 2011 14:08:16 Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
>> THISDIR is set by the netbase_4.45.bbappend of meta-yocto, I assume that
>> this should not be done and one should use the form you proposed
>> throughout the layers?
> 
> Correct, and this has already been done in master.

ah sorry, I should rebase my poky base.