All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>
To: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: Customizing kernels
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:17:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E307263.4010904@mentor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E30703C.6060708@mlbassoc.com>

On 07/27/2011 01:08 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2011-07-27 13:58, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 07/27/2011 10:25 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>> To run a customized kernel configuration, I've been doing this:
>>>    % bitbake virtual/kernel
>>>    % bitbake virtual/kernel -c menuconfig
>>>    % bitbake virtual/kernel -c compile -f
>>>    % bitbake virtual/kernel
>>>
>>> Is there some way that the kernel recipes (probably kernel.bbclass)
>>> could mark the compile state as invalid so that the '-c compile -f'
>>> step is no longer needed (implied)?
>>
>> What's the reason around the first bitbake?  I know with pstage you
>> needed to do that for an empty TMPDIR to populate out everything else,
>> but sstate shouldn't have that weakness.  It should just be:
>> $ bitbake virtual/kernel -c menuconfig
>> $ bitbake virtual/kernel
> 
>>
>> And get populating from sstate correct.
>>
> 
> The first step was just to get started, e.g. from scratch (no sstate, etc)

In that case, you can just to -c menuconfig and then build, but...

> The situation I'm really talking about is when you've already built the
> whole thing (presumably a full image, etc) and then want to change some
> kernel option, e.g. add a non-module driver and not rebuild the kernel
> from scratch, just recompile the required bits.  In this case, if you
> just run the two steps you quote, nothing happens during the second
> step because bitbake thinks that the whole recipe is complete.  Once
> you run '-c compile -f', it will rerun the compile and that invalidates
> the steps that follow in the recipe so they all run as well.

Yes, this is annoying.  The problem stems from menuconfig being
optional.  You could do instead:
bitbake -f -c configure virtual/kernel
bitbake -c menuconfig virtual/kernel
bitbake virtual/kernel

But indeed, that's not much better, it's just re-ordering things.  I
don't know off hand if there's a way to mark a task as invalid from
another task, which is what's needed here (especially when we move the
menuconfig bits to where busybox/etc can use them).

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation


      reply	other threads:[~2011-07-27 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-27 17:25 Customizing kernels Gary Thomas
2011-07-27 19:58 ` Tom Rini
2011-07-27 20:08   ` Gary Thomas
2011-07-27 20:17     ` Tom Rini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E307263.4010904@mentor.com \
    --to=tom_rini@mentor.com \
    --cc=gary@mlbassoc.com \
    --cc=poky@yoctoproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.