All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] KVM: MMU: improve write flooding detected
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:43:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E30CCB4.3080706@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E2FF1AA.3020507@redhat.com>

On 07/27/2011 07:08 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/27/2011 01:20 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> >>    }
>> >
>> >  I think this is a little dangerous.  A guest kernel may be instantiating multiple gptes on a page fault, but guest userspace hits only one of them (the one which caused the page fault) - I think Windows does this, but I'm not sure.
>> >
>>
>> I think this case is not bad: if the guest kernel need to write multiple gptes (>=3),
>> it will cause many page fault, we do better zap the shadow page and let it become writable as
>> soon as possible.
>> (And, we have pte-fetch, it can quickly establish the mapping for a new shadow page)
> 
> Actually, what should save us is unsync pages.  Why are we hitting this path at all?
> 

Avi,

The shadow page can not became unsync if it has other sp that sp.gfn = gfn && sp.role.level != 1,
for example:
- if the gfn is not only used for the last page structure(PTE page)
or
- gfn was used for upper page structure before but we do not zap the old shadow pages

So, if this gfn is written, #PF is generated, we hope that these sp can be zapped earlier,
the later #PF can detect this gfn is not have shadow pages, and the mapping can became writable.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-28  2:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-26 11:24 [PATCH 0/11] KVM: x86: optimize for guest page written Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-26 11:25 ` [PATCH 01/11] KVM: MMU: avoid pte_list_desc run out in kvm_mmu_pte_write Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-27  9:00   ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27  9:37     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-26 11:25 ` [PATCH 02/11] KVM: x86: cleanup pio/pout emulated Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-26 11:26 ` [PATCH 03/11] KVM: x86: fast emulate repeat string write instructions Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-26 12:27   ` Gleb Natapov
2011-07-26 13:53     ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27  1:47     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-27  4:26       ` Gleb Natapov
2011-07-27  6:32         ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-27  7:51           ` Gleb Natapov
2011-07-27  9:36             ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-27  9:04   ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27  9:37     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-26 11:28 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: MMU: do not mark access bit on pte write path Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-27  9:08   ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 10:04     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-26 11:28 ` [PATCH 05/11] KVM: MMU: cleanup FNAME(invlpg) Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-26 11:29 ` [PATCH 06/11] KVM: MMU: fast prefetch spte on invlpg path Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-26 11:29 ` [PATCH 07/11] KVM: MMU: remove unnecessary kvm_mmu_free_some_pages Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-26 11:30 ` [PATCH 08/11] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_pte_write function Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-26 11:31 ` [PATCH 09/11] KVM: MMU: remove the mismatch shadow page Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-27  9:11   ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27  9:13     ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 10:05       ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-26 11:31 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: MMU: fix detecting misaligned accessed Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-27  9:15   ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 10:10     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH 11/11] KVM: MMU: improve write flooding detected Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-27  9:23   ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 10:20     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-07-27 11:08       ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-28  2:43         ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-16  6:40 [PATCH 01/11] KVM: MMU: avoid pte_list_desc running out in kvm_mmu_pte_write Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:46 ` [PATCH 11/11] KVM: MMU: improve write flooding detected Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-23  8:00   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-23 10:55     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-23 12:38       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-23 16:32         ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-23 19:09           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-23 20:16             ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-24 20:05               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-25  2:04                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-25  4:42                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 13:21                     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-25 14:06                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 14:07                         ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25  7:40                   ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-25  7:57             ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-25 13:47               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-26  3:18                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-26 10:53                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-26 14:24                     ` Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E30CCB4.3080706@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.