From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QmSNE-0002gO-VW for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:19:45 +0200 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1QmSJ7-0003VN-32 from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:15:29 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.96.206]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:12:35 -0700 Received: from [172.30.80.87] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-02.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.96.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:15:28 -0700 Message-ID: <4E317D08.1020400@mentor.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:15:20 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <1311862667.30326.443.camel@phil-desktop> In-Reply-To: <1311862667.30326.443.camel@phil-desktop> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2011 15:12:35.0374 (UTC) FILETIME=[C7DFC4E0:01CC4D38] Subject: Re: lib vs lib64? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:19:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/28/2011 07:17 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 09:15 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >> With recent multilib changes for a pure 64-bit target (no multilib) should things be in /lib or /lib64? > > They should be in ${base_libdir}. Whether that's /lib or /lib64 is a > DISTRO choice I suppose. Assuming the libc has been patched for that arch. Or do we no longer need that change? I know there was a patch for mips64 to look at /lib not /lib64 for ld.so, etc, etc. -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation