From: f6bvp <f6bvp@free.fr>
To: Ralf Baechle DL5RB <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ROSE: Misc fixes
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:32:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E33351A.2040907@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110722105641.GA24477@linux-mips.org>
Le 22/07/2011 12:56, Ralf Baechle DL5RB a écrit :
> Most excellent! Take your time for testing - unfortunately we missed
> the v3.0 train already but it would be great if we could backport these
> fixes to -stable after some more positive testing.
>
> Is the system that was having these issues btw. running a preemptable kernel
> or does it have multiple cores or hyperthreading?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ralf
My two ROSE-FPAC nodes have been running for 8 days and 12 hours without
disruption.
Tonight I noticed that "use" parameter was negative (-1) while remote node
station F8COJ-11 was not connected (restart = "no" and tf counting).
Later, F8COJ-11 node got connected again (restart = "yes") and "use" = 1.
Then "use" returned to 0 after a few minutes.
This system is the one with SMP kernel and Voluntary Kernel Preemption
(Desktop).
/proc/net/rose_neigh
addr callsign dev count use mode restart t0 tf digipeaters
00005 F6BVP-5 ax2 1 0 DTE no 0 99
00004 F8COJ-11 ax2 2 -1 DTE no 0 87
00003 F6BVP-11 ax1 11 0 DTE no 0 0
00002 K4GBB-12 ax2 9 0 DCE yes 0 0
00001 RSLOOP-0 ??? 1 2 DCE yes 0 0
/proc/net/rose_neigh
addr callsign dev count use mode restart t0 tf digipeaters
00005 F6BVP-5 ax2 1 0 DTE no 0 0
00004 F8COJ-11 ax2 2 1 DCE yes 0 0
00003 F6BVP-11 ax1 11 0 DTE no 0 0
00002 K4GBB-12 ax2 9 0 DCE yes 0 0
00001 RSLOOP-0 ??? 1 2 DCE yes 0 0
/proc/net/rose_neigh
addr callsign dev count use mode restart t0 tf digipeaters
00005 F6BVP-5 ax2 1 0 DTE no 0 0
00004 F8COJ-11 ax2 2 0 DCE yes 0 0
00003 F6BVP-11 ax1 11 0 DTE no 0 0
00002 K4GBB-12 ax2 9 0 DCE yes 0 0
00001 RSLOOP-0 ??? 1 2 DCE yes 0 0
At the same times, on my second Linux system (with maxcpus=1 boot kernel
parameter),
use was 0 when not connected and it keeps displaying use=1 since ROSE
neighbour F8COJ has been connected again.
However, both nodes are performing well and are able to route ROSE
frames to F8COJ-11.
Bernard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-29 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-20 9:00 [PATCH 0/7] ROSE: Misc fixes Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 0:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] NET: ROSE: Fix race in SIOCRSSL2CALL ioctl accessing userspace Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 0:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] NET: ROSE: Factor our common code from functions Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 0:37 ` [PATCH 3/7] NET: ROSE: Protect rose_callsign with a spinlock Ralf Baechle
2013-08-06 17:57 ` [PATCH] ax25tools mheard : don't display empty records f6bvp@free
2013-08-07 8:17 ` Thomas Osterried
2013-08-07 10:06 ` f6bvp@free
2013-08-09 8:10 ` Thomas Osterried
2011-07-20 8:11 ` [PATCH 4/7] NET: ROSE: Make neighbour->use atomic Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 8:11 ` [PATCH 6/7] NET: ROSE: Move return statements hidden behind an if to their own line Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 8:11 ` [PATCH 5/7] NET: ROSE: Make rose_neigh_no atomic Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 8:11 ` [PATCH 7/7] NET: ROSE: Fix formatting Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH 0/7] ROSE: Misc fixes Bernard, f6bvp
2011-07-20 17:59 ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB
2011-07-22 9:10 ` Bernard, f6bvp
2011-07-22 10:56 ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB
2011-07-22 16:12 ` f6bvp
2011-07-23 13:28 ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB
2011-07-29 22:32 ` f6bvp [this message]
2011-08-08 13:40 ` f6bvp
2011-08-08 14:06 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-08-08 15:33 ` f6bvp
2011-08-19 13:07 ` f6bvp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E33351A.2040907@free.fr \
--to=f6bvp@free.fr \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.