From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4E34A253.5060502@domain.hid> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:31:15 -0500 From: at91_enthus MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4E34759D.40405@domain.hid> <20110730234906.023BF12B7AE4@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <20110730234906.023BF12B7AE4@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] AT91SAM9G45 support List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xenomai@xenomai.org On 07/30/2011 06:49 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear at91_enthus, > > In message <4E34759D.40405@domain.hid> you wrote: >> Is there's any chance that AT91SAM9G45 will be supported in Xenomai? > There is always a chance. Actually there are several options if a > feature does not exist yet: > > 1) Wait long enough until sombody else submits the needed code. > Problem: it might take longer than you can afford. > > 2) Hire an expert. > Problem: it might cost more than you can affort. > > 3) Implement it yourself. > Problem: it might take longer and cost more than you can afford. > > That's a _very_ common situation - see signature below. > > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > Indeed. I knew it was a long shot. I already have a few boards for experimenting with Xenomai. AT91SAM9G45 has some interesting features with respect to other AT91s. Thanks, R.