From: "F. P. Beekhof" <fpbeekhof@gmail.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>,
"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Machine check exception
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:56:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E357B31.8070906@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110731120944.GA17348@aftab>
>> I found that one can enable ECC on ram in the bios, which I did. As
>> far as I know, this is non-ECC ram, so frankly I'm at a loss about
>
> Maybe the BIOS is not properly detecting whether DRAM is ECC or not.
> Normally, if it is not, it should simply remove the option to enable ECC
> from the menu.
>
> To check what the hw says, do
>
> $ setpci -s 18.3 0x44.l
>
> as root and send me the result pls.
>
$ sudo setpci -s 18.3 0x44.l
00400040
> I'd suggest you run your system at full swing and watch it for signs of
> trouble a couple of days longer just in case.
Ok.
>> Are there any conclusions that can be drawn from this experiment ?
>
> Yeah, it means that your BIOS doesn't seem to have the fix for erratum
> #131: http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/25759.pdf, page 83.
So, this is not a problem with the promise-sata driver as I originally
suspected. I guess then we can take this discussion off the linux-ide
list...
> I don't know whether there is BIOS for your ancient CPU :-) and if there
> were, whether upgrading it won't break something else.
>
> If I were you, I'd run the automated script hooks and don't care about
> upgrade... provided we don't see any other hickups that is and provided
> we manage to automate them so that you don't have to boot into recovery
> console every time.
>
> Let me know how it all plays out.
Will do! Many thanks!
> HTH.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-31 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-27 11:05 Machine check exception F. P. Beekhof
2011-07-27 13:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 15:31 ` F. P. Beekhof
2011-07-27 17:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 20:54 ` F. P. Beekhof
2011-07-27 21:30 ` F. P. Beekhof
2011-07-28 7:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-31 8:22 ` F. P. Beekhof
2011-07-31 12:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-31 15:56 ` F. P. Beekhof [this message]
2011-08-01 8:48 ` Borislav Petkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-05 17:41 Machine Check Exception Matteo Croce
2003-12-03 11:05 machine check exception Nicholas Mucci
2003-12-03 13:05 ` Russell Coker
2003-12-03 13:19 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-12-15 20:22 Machine Check Exception Felix von Leitner
2002-12-15 20:39 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2002-12-16 19:55 ` Felipe W Damasio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E357B31.8070906@gmail.com \
--to=fpbeekhof@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.