All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche" <klaus.kusche@computerix.info>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Feature request] Multiple X servers on one graphics card?
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 16:22:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E38083C.2060407@computerix.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_Puz01iSfhgkjc0_DsFUN5-nHbisf5y0Y9sPRVeFaoXow@mail.gmail.com>

On 2011-08-02 14:59, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
> <klaus.kusche@computerix.info>  wrote:
>> Hmmm, what's about the opposite approach?
>> To me, it sounds simpler and more logical when the kernel always creates
>> one device node per output (or maybe dynamically per connected output),
>> without any need for configuration or device assignment.
>
> You almost always have more connectors than display controllers (e.g.,
> you might have displayport, svideo, DVI-I and VGA, but only two
> display controllers so you can only use two of the connectors at any
> time).  Also certain combinations of connectors are not possible
> depending on the hw (e.g., the svideo and the VGA port may share the
> same DAC, so you can only use one or the other at the same time).

Hmmm, for my purposes I was only thinking about new, current hardware,
not about previous-generation cards, and only about digital outputs:

* The professional, high-quality solution would be ATI's FirePro 2460:
4 mini Displayports, all active at the same time, single slot
(passive cooling, < 20 W, so that's a great energy saver, too,
competing with thin and zero clients,
and it's silent and long-lived)

* The XFX HD-677X-Z5F3 most likely offers most ports per Euro and space:
5 mini Displayports, all active at the same time, single slot,
for less than 100 Euro

(this would result in 16/20 seats with any quad-crossfire mainboard
and 28/35 seats with some server mainboards if the BIOS is able
to assign addresses to 7 graphics cards)

Even the low-cost 6450 supports 3 and the 6570 supports 4
independent simultaneous outputs, so any ATI 6xxx card can drive
all its outputs at the same time
(and I believe that was also true for ATI 5xxx)
However, cards with 3 or 4 digital outputs are hard to find
in that price range... (XFX HD6570 is one of them)

But you're correct, my suggestion above needs to be refined:
One DRI device per display controller.

Klaus.

-- 
Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
Private address: Rainstraße 9/1, 88316 Isny, Germany
+49 7562 6211377 Klaus.Kusche@computerix.info http://www.computerix.info
Office address: NTA Isny gGmbH, Seidenstraße 12-35, 88316 Isny, Germany
+49 7562 9707 36 kusche@nta-isny.de http://www.nta-isny.de

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-02 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-30 18:48 [Feature request] Multiple X servers on one graphics card? Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-07-31 20:09 ` Dave Airlie
2011-08-01  8:14   ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-01 19:41   ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-01 19:47     ` Dave Airlie
2011-08-01 20:22       ` Alan Cox
2011-08-02  8:17         ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-02 10:26           ` Alan Cox
2011-08-02 10:28             ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-02 11:10               ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-02 15:27                 ` Michel Dänzer
2011-08-02 11:54             ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-02 15:43         ` Christoph Bumiller
2011-08-02 12:59     ` Alex Deucher
2011-08-02 14:22       ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche [this message]
2011-08-02 14:34         ` Alex Deucher
2011-08-02 15:28           ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-02 15:48             ` Alex Deucher
2011-08-02 19:11               ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-03 17:51                 ` Alex Deucher
2011-08-03 19:25                   ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-02 23:31               ` Chi-Thanh Christopher Nguyen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-02 13:34 Tomasz Borowik
2011-08-03  6:35 Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E38083C.2060407@computerix.info \
    --to=klaus.kusche@computerix.info \
    --cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.