All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eglibc: unify eglibc-utils/${PN}-utils and remove PACKAGES from eglibc.inc
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 10:27:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E38336B.8010604@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110729073415.GM15286@jama.jama.net>

On 07/29/2011 12:34 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:17:31AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> * PACKAGES were defined in eglibc.inc as well as eglibc-package.inc, definition
>>    from eglibc.inc was overriden from recipes including eglibc.inc only
>> * 37ff0fea8f7180b1a9d91d24dfe1735730427497 changed RPROVIDES_eglibc-utils,
>>    but ie FILES_ were still using eglibc-utils instead of ${PN}-utils, unify
>>    all eglibc-utils
>
> BTW: there is still problem with ie
> RPROVIDES_${PN}-utils = "glibc-utils"
> leading to
> ERROR: Trying to resolve runtime dependency glibc-utils resulted in conflicting PREFERRED_PROVIDER entries being found.
> The providers found were: ['virtual:nativesdk:/OE/shr-core/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.13.bb', '/OE/shr-core/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.13.bb']
> The PREFERRED_PROVIDER entries resulting in this conflict were: ['PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libc-nativesdk = eglibc-nativesdk', 'PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libc = eglibc']
> NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime glibc-utils (eglibc, eglibc-nativesdk, external-csl-toolchain, external-poky-toolchain)
> NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match glibc-utils
>
> now with glibc recipes removed, do we need to RPROVIDE this or can we fix recipes
> RDEPENDing on glibc-utils to use eglibc-utils directly?
>
> otherwise we should fix right side to use ${PN/eglibc/glibc} to keep
> eglibc-nativesdk from providing glibc-utils (glibc-nativesdk-utils only).
>
Martin,

Richard pushed a fix to this and possibly addressed most of your changes 
in the above patch also, please rebase you patch against the 
oe-core/master and resend if you have any additional fixes to make in 
this area.

Thanks
	Sau!

> Regards,
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core



  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-02 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-29  7:17 [PATCH] eglibc: unify eglibc-utils/${PN}-utils and remove PACKAGES from eglibc.inc Martin Jansa
2011-07-29  7:34 ` Martin Jansa
2011-08-02 17:27   ` Saul Wold [this message]
2011-08-08  7:56     ` [PATCH 10/10] eglibc: " Martin Jansa
2011-08-08 13:00       ` Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E38336B.8010604@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.