From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [143.182.124.37]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F14A4C8009A for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 15:35:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2011 13:35:55 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,307,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="3516841" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.78]) ([10.255.14.78]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2011 13:35:55 -0700 Message-ID: <4E385FAA.9090300@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:35:54 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Eggleton References: <2273c01d6547d6d1eb5b8a60dd061c5d3722856d.1311603837.git.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> <4ADD3708-C485-47E1-9BD6-B4839E5E8151@dominion.thruhere.net> <201107251549.07198.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <201107251549.07198.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample: add rm_work example X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:35:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/25/2011 07:49 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Monday 25 July 2011 15:44:32 Koen Kooi wrote: >> Op 25 jul. 2011, om 16:28 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven: >>> +# Uncomment this to delete work files as the build progresses rather >>> than +# keeping them around, which saves a lot of disk space. However, This reads as keeping them around save a lot of disk space to me. You can add a comma after progresses, or reword to group the modifier with the subject. >>> if any +# problems arise it can be useful to have the work files to >>> examine, which +# is why it is off by default. >>> +#INHERIT += "rm_work" >> >> That implies that you expect problems to happen by default :) > > It does say "if" ;) I'm happy to take suggestions on an alternative > comment... If we assume people will be adding and developing recipes as part of the typical usage model, then yes, I would expect problems to happen by default - it is development afterall. :) -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel