From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Consistent spelling of cpuidle_idle_call() Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:24:55 -0700 Message-ID: <4E3AD5E7.6040105@codeaurora.org> References: <1312475071-22973-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:9275 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752418Ab1HDRY4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2011 13:24:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1312475071-22973-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: David Brown Cc: Linus Torvalds , Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman , Paul Mundt , x86@kernel.org, Len Brown , Mark Brown On 08/04/2011 09:24 AM, David Brown wrote: > Commit a0bfa1373859e9d11dc92561a8667588803e42d8 mispells > cpuidle_idle_call() on ARM and SH code. Fix this to be consistent. > > Cc: Kevin Hilman > Cc: Paul Mundt > Cc: x86@kernel.org > Cc: Len Brown > Signed-off-by: David Brown > --- > The referenced commit breaks compilation on ARM, and appears it would > do so on SH as well. Mark Brown sent this patch[1] months ago when this build breakage was noticed in linux-next. What happened to that patch? It looks like the patch that introduced the breakage was pulled from linux-next shortly after and then reintroduced today. [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/4/109 -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:24:55 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Consistent spelling of cpuidle_idle_call() Message-Id: <4E3AD5E7.6040105@codeaurora.org> List-Id: References: <1312475071-22973-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <1312475071-22973-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 08/04/2011 09:24 AM, David Brown wrote: > Commit a0bfa1373859e9d11dc92561a8667588803e42d8 mispells > cpuidle_idle_call() on ARM and SH code. Fix this to be consistent. > > Cc: Kevin Hilman > Cc: Paul Mundt > Cc: x86@kernel.org > Cc: Len Brown > Signed-off-by: David Brown > --- > The referenced commit breaks compilation on ARM, and appears it would > do so on SH as well. Mark Brown sent this patch[1] months ago when this build breakage was noticed in linux-next. What happened to that patch? It looks like the patch that introduced the breakage was pulled from linux-next shortly after and then reintroduced today. [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/4/109 -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:24:55 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle: Consistent spelling of cpuidle_idle_call() In-Reply-To: <1312475071-22973-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> References: <1312475071-22973-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <4E3AD5E7.6040105@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/04/2011 09:24 AM, David Brown wrote: > Commit a0bfa1373859e9d11dc92561a8667588803e42d8 mispells > cpuidle_idle_call() on ARM and SH code. Fix this to be consistent. > > Cc: Kevin Hilman > Cc: Paul Mundt > Cc: x86 at kernel.org > Cc: Len Brown > Signed-off-by: David Brown > --- > The referenced commit breaks compilation on ARM, and appears it would > do so on SH as well. Mark Brown sent this patch[1] months ago when this build breakage was noticed in linux-next. What happened to that patch? It looks like the patch that introduced the breakage was pulled from linux-next shortly after and then reintroduced today. [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/4/109 -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.