All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, lueckintel@yahoo.com,
	kimwooyoung@gmail.com, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: New vsyscall emulation breaks JITs
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:32:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E3C8B8A.3080007@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAObL_7HPgqvoBm4pkTi9ZmF1K0SsyQWKev_idzjLJ9ST=RO=9A@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/05/2011 05:20 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> 
> I was thinking of 0x20 - 0x39.  0x40, 0x41, and 0x42 should do the
> trick.  I'll cook up a patch.
> 
> If you want to keep those vectors available for devices as well, we
> could hook do_general_protection instead, but that's a little messy.
> Are there x86 machines out there that are starved for interrupt
> vectors?
> 

Yes, but 3 aren't going to matter much.

However, on systems which have interrupt migration enabled we're not
using 0x21-0x2f for anything (because we need a single interrupt with
absolutely lowest priority).  Out of that range, there are a couple of
values which should be safe to use because they would be harmless
instructions of various forms:

	0x24	- AND AL, imm8
	0x25	- AND EAX, imm32
	0x26	- ES:
	0x2C	- SUB AL, imm8
	0x2D	- SUB EAX, imm32
	0x2E	- CS:

[Cc: Suresh who is the expert on the interrupt assignments]

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-06  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-05 20:09 New vsyscall emulation breaks JITs Andi Kleen
2011-08-05 20:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-05 20:26   ` Andi Kleen
2011-08-05 20:36     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-05 20:47       ` Andi Kleen
2011-08-05 20:45   ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-08-05 20:48     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-05 20:52       ` Andi Kleen
2011-08-05 21:00         ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-08-05 21:21           ` Andi Kleen
2011-08-05 21:26             ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-08-05 22:06               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-05 22:11                 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-08-06  0:20                   ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-08-06  0:32                     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-08-06  3:01                       ` [RFC] x86-64: Allow emulated vsyscalls from user addresses Andy Lutomirski
2011-08-06  3:04                       ` [RFC v2] " Andy Lutomirski
2011-08-06  6:45                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-08-07 12:19                           ` Borislav Petkov
2011-08-07 12:58                             ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-08-07 15:44                               ` Borislav Petkov
2011-08-07 16:14                                 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-08-11 13:16                         ` Pavel Machek
2011-08-11 13:27                           ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-08-09 22:27                       ` New vsyscall emulation breaks JITs Suresh Siddha
2011-08-09 13:26             ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-08-09 15:04               ` Andi Kleen
2011-08-09 15:22                 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-08-09 16:47                   ` [RFC] x86-64: Add vsyscall=emulate|native|none option Andy Lutomirski
2011-08-09 19:54                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-09 16:57                   ` New vsyscall emulation breaks JITs H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-09 17:05                     ` Andrew Lutomirski
     [not found]                       ` <1312919938.17118.YahooMailNeo@web120010.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
2011-08-09 20:59                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-09 21:04                         ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-08-09 22:36                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-10  0:56                             ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]                             ` <1312934493.45753.YahooMailNeo@web120015.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
2011-08-10  1:49                               ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E3C8B8A.3080007@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=kimwooyoung@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lueckintel@yahoo.com \
    --cc=luto@mit.edu \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.