From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Frediano Ziglio <freddy77@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix-aio-compat: fix latency issues
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:54:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E3FDC93.3000701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHt6W4eThZFXeJ-CAbK7Ng4ibr8gysch3DPwQ2F_6qDKV5j9Ng@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/08/2011 03:49 PM, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> 2011/8/8 Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>:
> > In certain circumstances, posix-aio-compat can incur a lot of latency:
> > - threads are created by vcpu threads, so if vcpu affinity is set,
> > aio threads inherit vcpu affinity. This can cause many aio threads
> > to compete for one cpu.
> > - we can create up to max_threads (64) aio threads in one go; since a
> > pthread_create can take around 30μs, we have up to 2ms of cpu time
> > under a global lock.
> >
> > Fix by:
> > - moving thread creation to the main thread, so we inherit the main
> > thread's affinity instead of the vcpu thread's affinity.
> > - if a thread is currently being created, and we need to create yet
> > another thread, let thread being born create the new thread, reducing
> > the amount of time we spend under the main thread.
> > - drop the local lock while creating a thread (we may still hold the
> > global mutex, though)
> >
> > Note this doesn't eliminate latency completely; scheduler artifacts or
> > lack of host cpu resources can still cause it. We may want pre-allocated
> > threads when this cannot be tolerated.
> >
> > Thanks to Uli Obergfell of Red Hat for his excellent analysis and suggestions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>
>
> Why not calling pthread_attr_setaffinity_np (where available) before
> thread creation or shed_setaffinity at thread start instead of telling
> another thread to create a thread for us just to get affinity cleared?
>
The entire qemu process may be affined to a subset of the host cpus; we
don't want to break that.
For example:
taskset 0xf0 qemu ....
(qemu) info cpus
<pin individual vcpu threads to host cpus>
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Frediano Ziglio <freddy77@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] posix-aio-compat: fix latency issues
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:54:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E3FDC93.3000701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHt6W4eThZFXeJ-CAbK7Ng4ibr8gysch3DPwQ2F_6qDKV5j9Ng@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/08/2011 03:49 PM, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> 2011/8/8 Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>:
> > In certain circumstances, posix-aio-compat can incur a lot of latency:
> > - threads are created by vcpu threads, so if vcpu affinity is set,
> > aio threads inherit vcpu affinity. This can cause many aio threads
> > to compete for one cpu.
> > - we can create up to max_threads (64) aio threads in one go; since a
> > pthread_create can take around 30μs, we have up to 2ms of cpu time
> > under a global lock.
> >
> > Fix by:
> > - moving thread creation to the main thread, so we inherit the main
> > thread's affinity instead of the vcpu thread's affinity.
> > - if a thread is currently being created, and we need to create yet
> > another thread, let thread being born create the new thread, reducing
> > the amount of time we spend under the main thread.
> > - drop the local lock while creating a thread (we may still hold the
> > global mutex, though)
> >
> > Note this doesn't eliminate latency completely; scheduler artifacts or
> > lack of host cpu resources can still cause it. We may want pre-allocated
> > threads when this cannot be tolerated.
> >
> > Thanks to Uli Obergfell of Red Hat for his excellent analysis and suggestions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>
>
> Why not calling pthread_attr_setaffinity_np (where available) before
> thread creation or shed_setaffinity at thread start instead of telling
> another thread to create a thread for us just to get affinity cleared?
>
The entire qemu process may be affined to a subset of the host cpus; we
don't want to break that.
For example:
taskset 0xf0 qemu ....
(qemu) info cpus
<pin individual vcpu threads to host cpus>
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-08 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-08 11:37 [PATCH] posix-aio-compat: fix latency issues Avi Kivity
2011-08-08 11:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2011-08-08 12:34 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-08 12:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2011-08-08 12:42 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-08 12:49 ` Frediano Ziglio
2011-08-08 12:54 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-08-08 12:54 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-08 13:21 ` Frediano Ziglio
2011-08-08 13:26 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-12 13:24 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-12 13:24 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-14 3:43 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-14 3:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E3FDC93.3000701@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=freddy77@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.