All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rmallon@gmail.com (Ryan Mallon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ep93xx: clock.c: fix all checkpatch.pl issues
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 07:47:13 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E41AAE1.7010008@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201108091411.32479.hartleys@visionengravers.com>

On 10/08/11 07:11, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> This fixes all the checkpatch.pl errors and warnings found in this file.
>
>   #201: ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
>   #201: ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
>   #250: WARNING: line over 80 characters
>   #281: WARNING: line over 80 characters
>   #361: WARNING: line over 80 characters
>   #435: ERROR: trailing whitespace
>   #438: ERROR: trailing whitespace
>   #449: ERROR: trailing whitespace
>   #451: ERROR: trailing whitespace
>
>   total: 6 errors, 3 warnings, 562 lines checked
>
> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
> Cc: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
> index ca4de71..14dba95 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static struct clk clk_m2m1 = {
>  	.enable_mask	= EP93XX_SYSCON_PWRCNT_DMA_M2M1,
>  };
>  
> -#define INIT_CK(dev,con,ck)					\
> +#define INIT_CK(dev, con, ck)					\
>  	{ .dev_id = dev, .con_id = con, .clk = ck }

Okay.

>  
>  static struct clk_lookup clocks[] = {
> @@ -247,7 +247,8 @@ static void __clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
>  			v = __raw_readl(clk->enable_reg);
>  			v |= clk->enable_mask;
>  			if (clk->sw_locked)
> -				ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(v, clk->enable_reg);
> +				ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(v,
> +

I think this makes the code arguably less readable. The line only just
extends over 80 characters.

> 						clk->enable_reg);
>  			else
>  				__raw_writel(v, clk->enable_reg);
>  		}
> @@ -278,7 +279,8 @@ static void __clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
>  			v = __raw_readl(clk->enable_reg);
>  			v &= ~clk->enable_mask;
>  			if (clk->sw_locked)
> -				ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(v, clk->enable_reg);
> +				ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(v,
> +						clk->enable_reg);

Same here.

>  			else
>  				__raw_writel(v, clk->enable_reg);
>  		}
> @@ -358,7 +360,7 @@ static int calc_clk_div(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate,
>  	int i, found = 0, __div = 0, __pdiv = 0;
>  
>  	/* Don't exceed the maximum rate */
> -	max_rate = max3(clk_pll1.rate / 4, clk_pll2.rate / 4, clk_xtali.rate / 4);
> +	max_rate = max3(clk_pll1.rate/4, clk_pll2.rate/4, clk_xtali.rate/4);

Don't delete the spaces around the operators. Again, this line is only
just over 80 characters. I think its okay as is. If you must fix it,
break on one of the commas instead.

>  	rate = min(rate, max_rate);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -432,35 +434,32 @@ static int set_i2s_sclk_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
>  	unsigned val = __raw_readl(clk->enable_reg);
>  
>  	if (rate == clk_i2s_mclk.rate / 2)
> -		ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(val & ~EP93XX_I2SCLKDIV_SDIV, 
> -					     clk->enable_reg);
> +		val &= ~EP93XX_I2SCLKDIV_SDIV;
>  	else if (rate == clk_i2s_mclk.rate / 4)
> -		ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(val | EP93XX_I2SCLKDIV_SDIV, 
> -					     clk->enable_reg);
> +		val |= EP93XX_I2SCLKDIV_SDIV;
>  	else
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(val, clk->enable_reg);
>  	clk_i2s_sclk.rate = rate;
>  	return 0;

This change is good.

>  }
>  
>  static int set_i2s_lrclk_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
>  {
> -	unsigned val = __raw_readl(clk->enable_reg) & 
> +	unsigned val = __raw_readl(clk->enable_reg) &
>  		~EP93XX_I2SCLKDIV_LRDIV_MASK;
> -	
> +
>  	if (rate == clk_i2s_sclk.rate / 32)
> -		ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(val | EP93XX_I2SCLKDIV_LRDIV32,
> -					     clk->enable_reg);
> +		val |= EP93XX_I2SCLKDIV_LRDIV32;
>  	else if (rate == clk_i2s_sclk.rate / 64)
> -		ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(val | EP93XX_I2SCLKDIV_LRDIV64,
> -					     clk->enable_reg);
> +		val |= EP93XX_I2SCLKDIV_LRDIV64;
>  	else if (rate == clk_i2s_sclk.rate / 128)
> -		ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(val | EP93XX_I2SCLKDIV_LRDIV128,
> -					     clk->enable_reg);
> +		val |= EP93XX_I2SCLKDIV_LRDIV128;
>  	else
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(val, clk->enable_reg);
>  	clk_i2s_lrclk.rate = rate;
>  	return 0;
>  }
This is good too.

~Ryan

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-09 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-09 21:11 [PATCH] ep93xx: clock.c: fix all checkpatch.pl issues H Hartley Sweeten
2011-08-09 21:47 ` Ryan Mallon [this message]
2011-08-09 21:57   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-08-09 22:16   ` H Hartley Sweeten

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E41AAE1.7010008@gmail.com \
    --to=rmallon@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.