From: Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] mount.gfs2 obsolete upstream (scheduled to be removed)
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:43:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E427CF4.3040701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312978592.2765.7.camel@menhir>
On 08/10/2011 02:16 PM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a reminder that when Fedora 14 is no longer being updated, we
> intend to remove mount.gfs2 from the upstream gfs2-utils source. There
> should be no user visible changes beyond the removal of the utility when
> this happens as kernels and gfs2_controld have been able to use the new
> system for mounting for some time.
>
> So this is just a heads up so that it isn't too much of a surprise when
> it happens in a few months time.
>
> Also scheduled for removal are gfs2_quota and gfs2_tool. Both of these
> will be removed shortly after Fedora 17 is released. They are both
> considered obsolete and alternatives have been available for some time.
> In the case of gfs2_quota, that means the generic quota package that is
> supplied with Fedora. In the case of gfs2_tool, that means tunegfs2 or
> mount options, depending on which feature is required.
>
> If there are any questions, please let us know,
>
> Steve.
>
>
It might be a good idea to lay down a map of upstream versions required
to drop mount.gfs2 and quota.
New gfs2-utils without mount.gfs2 requires kernel > x.y.z and
gfs_controld > a.b.c. (we ship gfs_controld from gfs2-utils, but people
might still have old versions around... just in case)
similar for quota support.. is a new quota-tools version required?
kernel? etc.
Mapping to fedora releases is only helpful to fedora users :) but it
leaves other distros in the dark. Specially if some features are working
in fedora only by meaning of local patches.
Cheers
Fabio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-10 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-10 12:16 [Cluster-devel] mount.gfs2 obsolete upstream (scheduled to be removed) Steven Whitehouse
2011-08-10 12:43 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto [this message]
2011-08-10 13:26 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-08-10 15:42 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E427CF4.3040701@redhat.com \
--to=fdinitto@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.