From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michel Alexandre Salim Subject: Re: i915 native backlight never got merged Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:14:09 +0200 Message-ID: <4E428421.1000605@fedoraproject.org> References: <1312829662.3379.138.camel@fourier> <20110808213140.GA32504@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93579F5BC for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 06:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fxd20 with SMTP id 20so1158637fxd.36 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 06:16:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Keith Packard Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Andrew Morton List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On 08/09/2011 12:43 AM, Keith Packard wrote: > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 22:31:40 +0100, Matthew Garrett = wrote: > = >> Yup. There's a small set of systems that appear to provide no firmware = >> control mechanism. > = > There were a few comments in that old thread about the patch as > submitted; is there an updated version? > = The last patch I could find is in linux-next's next-20110726 tag; looks like it disappeared from Matthew's git tree afterwards, and thus not in any subsequent linux-next tags. commit fa7419eee713b989e2c268c7b06ec9a544a2b647 Author: Matthew Garrett Date: Sat Jul 16 23:31:01 2011 +1000 FYI, I'm using that on top of Linux 3.0 and 3.1-rc1 and it still works fine. -- = Michel Alexandre Salim =B5blog: http://identi.ca/hircus http://twitter.com/hircus GPG key ID: 78884778 () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments