All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: emmanuel.deloget@efixo.com
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Enable 'make CONFIG_FOO=y oldconfig'
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:52:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E42C575.1040408@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E42B940.6070904@efixo.com>

On 08/10/2011 12:00 PM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
> 
> I understand that my question is indeed neither wanted nor clever, but 
> what's the point of trying to support "make CONFIG_FOO=y"?
> 
> Will we be expected to type a 42 meters long command line to compile the 
> kernel instead of doing a menuconfig in the foreseable future? (and 
> between typos, unmet dependencies and the myriad of other possible 
> errors, I'm not sure I'll get more free time).
> 
> I don't get it. If the goal is to help the kernel hackers and if it 
> really helps them it might be a thing to do - it might prove useful for 
> very simple CONFIG_ options but I'm not sure this will stay true for the 
> general case.
> 

That's useful for some cases, though, instead of having to create a
file; the driving cases here are architecture, platform or 32/64-bit
selection.  For longer ones you'll create a file.

And no, menuconfig and .config files will not go away.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-10 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1312067499.22074.59.camel@i7.infradead.org>
2011-07-30 23:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Factor out conf_validate_choice_val() function from conf_read_simple() David Woodhouse
2011-07-31  2:17   ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31 22:21     ` David Woodhouse
2011-07-30 23:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] Enable 'make CONFIG_FOO=y oldconfig' David Woodhouse
2011-07-30 23:44   ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-30 23:53     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-31  0:05       ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31  0:29         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-31  1:06           ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31  1:28             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-31  2:09               ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31  2:09                 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31  5:21                 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31 22:18                 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-09 15:22                   ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31  7:33             ` David Woodhouse
2011-07-31 16:37               ` Randy Dunlap
2011-07-31 16:57                 ` David Woodhouse
2011-07-31 17:08                   ` Randy Dunlap
2011-07-31 17:40                     ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-09 14:14         ` Michal Marek
2011-08-09 15:26           ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 12:59             ` Michal Marek
2011-08-10 13:07               ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 14:15                 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 14:17                   ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 14:34                     ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 16:33                       ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 17:00                         ` Emmanuel Deloget
2011-08-10 17:52                           ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-08-10 17:44                         ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 17:54                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-10 17:59                           ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 18:40                             ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 18:52                               ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 22:33                                 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 23:16                                   ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11  3:29                                     ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-11  8:42                                       ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11  8:58                                         ` Michal Marek
2011-08-11 11:10                                           ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11 11:15                                             ` Andreas Schwab
2011-08-11 11:40                                               ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11 11:56                                                 ` Michal Marek
2011-08-11 13:20                                                   ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11 14:57                                                   ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-11 14:57                                                     ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-11 15:07                                                     ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11 15:24                                                       ` Michal Marek
2011-08-11 15:50                                                         ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 17:01                   ` Randy Dunlap
2011-08-10 17:25                     ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E42C575.1040408@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=emmanuel.deloget@efixo.com \
    --cc=lacombar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.