All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
To: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How should .fb_check_var adjust parameters ?
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:06:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E45172E.3020409@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201108121308.59532.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

Hi Laurent,

On 08/12/2011 11:08 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm implementing support for fb_set_par() in a driver, and came to think about
> how fb_check_var should behave.
>
> The purpose of that operation is to let drivers verify and adjust a given set
> of fb_var_screeninfo parameters. Looking at various fbdev drivers, the
> function behaviour is clearly left to the author's preferences. Some drivers
> return an error when the parameters don't match the hardware capabilities
> exactly, other drivers adjust them in pretty much non-standardized ways, and
> some other drivers mix both behaviours.
>
> Is anyone aware of guidelines regarding how .fb_char_var should be implemented
> ? Under which conditions should it return an error, and under which conditions
> should it adjust parameters ? When adjusting parameters, how should it do so ?
> For instance, if xres>  xres_virtual, should xres be lowered or xres_virtual
> raised ?

I try to stick to
drivers/video/skeletonfb.c

  *	If the var passed in is slightly
  *	off by what the hardware can support then we alter the var PASSED in
  *	to what we can do.
  *
  *      For values that are off, this function must round them _up_ to the
  *      next value that is supported by the hardware.  If the value is
  *      greater than the highest value supported by the hardware, then this
  *      function must return -EINVAL.

Sure that still allows a lot of differences in implementation.


Best regards,

Florian Tobias Schandinat

      reply	other threads:[~2011-08-12 12:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-12 11:08 How should .fb_check_var adjust parameters ? Laurent Pinchart
2011-08-12 12:06 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E45172E.3020409@gmx.de \
    --to=florianschandinat@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.