From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:24:19 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: sched_clock: allow sched_clock to be selected at runtime In-Reply-To: <20110812122129.GA2643@pulham.picochip.com> References: <1313078531-25610-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20110812122129.GA2643@pulham.picochip.com> Message-ID: <4E451B73.9060007@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/08/11 13:21, Jamie Iles wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:02:11PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> sched_clock() is yet another blocker on the road to the single >> image. This patch implements an idea by Russell King: >> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg49561.html >> >> Instead of asking the platform to implement both sched_clock() >> itself and the rollover callback, simply register a read() >> function, and let the ARM code care about sched_clock() itself, >> the conversion to ns and the rollover. sched_clock() uses >> this read() function as an indirection to the platform code. >> >> This allow some simplifications and possibly some footprint gain >> when multiple platforms are compiled in. Among the drawbacks, >> the removal of the *_fixed_sched_clock optimization which could >> negatively impact some platforms (sa1100, tegra, versatile >> and omap). >> >> Tested on 11MPCore, OMAP4 and Tegra. >> >> Cc: Imre Kaloz >> Cc: Krzysztof Halasa >> Cc: Tony Lindgren >> Cc: Eric Miao >> Cc: Colin Cross >> Cc: Erik Gilling >> Cc: Olof Johansson >> Cc: Linus Walleij >> Cc: Sascha Hauer >> Cc: Alessandro Rubini >> Cc: STEricsson >> Cc: Lennert Buytenhek >> Cc: Nicolas Pitre >> Cc: Ben Dooks >> Cc: Kukjin Kim >> Cc: Jamie Iles > > Tested-by: Jamie Iles Thanks Jamie. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...