From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][RFT][PATCH V2 2/2] b43: fix DMA on some bugged hardware
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 17:26:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E46FA21.9060207@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313001339-11211-2-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>
On 08/10/2011 01:35 PM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> Some hardware with 64-bit DMA uses lower address word for setting
> routing (translation) bit. Add workaround for such boards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki<zajec5@gmail.com>
> ---
> This requires testing on at least 1 normal 64-bit DMA card and 1 32-bit
> DMA card. So far it was tested only on my 14e4:4329 where it fixed DMA.
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.h | 6 ++
> 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h
> index c818b0b..3aee322 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h
> @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ struct b43_dma {
> struct b43_dmaring *rx_ring;
>
> u32 translation; /* Routing bits */
> + bool translation_in_low; /* Should translation bit go into low addr? */
> bool parity; /* Check for parity */
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c
> index 0953ce1..547851c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,38 @@
> * into separate slots. */
> #define TX_SLOTS_PER_FRAME 2
>
> +static u32 b43_dma_address(struct b43_dma *dma, dma_addr_t dmaaddr,
> + enum b43_addrtype addrtype)
> +{
> + u32 uninitialized_var(addr);
> +
> + switch (addrtype) {
> + case B43_DMA_ADDR_LOW:
> + addr = dmaaddr& 0xFFFFFFFF;
> + if (dma->translation_in_low) {
> + addr&= ~SSB_DMA_TRANSLATION_MASK;
> + addr |= dma->translation;
> + }
> + break;
> + case B43_DMA_ADDR_HIGH:
> + addr = dmaaddr>> 32;
> + if (!dma->translation_in_low) {
> + addr&= ~SSB_DMA_TRANSLATION_MASK;
> + addr |= dma->translation;
> + }
> + break;
> + case B43_DMA_ADDR_EXT:
> + if (dma->translation_in_low)
> + addr = dmaaddr& 0xFFFFFFFF;
> + else
> + addr = dmaaddr>> 32;
> + addr&= SSB_DMA_TRANSLATION_MASK;
> + addr>>= SSB_DMA_TRANSLATION_SHIFT;
> + break;
Sorry I missed this earlier, but when this code is compiled on a 32-bit system,
the compiler spits out
CC [M] drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.o
drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c: In function ?b43_dma_address?:
drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c:64: warning: right shift count >= width of type
drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c:74: warning: right shift count >= width of type
This is reasonable as dma_addr_t is 32 bits.
Larry
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][RFT][PATCH V2 2/2] b43: fix DMA on some bugged hardware
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 17:26:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E46FA21.9060207@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313001339-11211-2-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>
On 08/10/2011 01:35 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Some hardware with 64-bit DMA uses lower address word for setting
> routing (translation) bit. Add workaround for such boards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki<zajec5@gmail.com>
> ---
> This requires testing on at least 1 normal 64-bit DMA card and 1 32-bit
> DMA card. So far it was tested only on my 14e4:4329 where it fixed DMA.
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.h | 6 ++
> 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h
> index c818b0b..3aee322 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h
> @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ struct b43_dma {
> struct b43_dmaring *rx_ring;
>
> u32 translation; /* Routing bits */
> + bool translation_in_low; /* Should translation bit go into low addr? */
> bool parity; /* Check for parity */
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c
> index 0953ce1..547851c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,38 @@
> * into separate slots. */
> #define TX_SLOTS_PER_FRAME 2
>
> +static u32 b43_dma_address(struct b43_dma *dma, dma_addr_t dmaaddr,
> + enum b43_addrtype addrtype)
> +{
> + u32 uninitialized_var(addr);
> +
> + switch (addrtype) {
> + case B43_DMA_ADDR_LOW:
> + addr = dmaaddr& 0xFFFFFFFF;
> + if (dma->translation_in_low) {
> + addr&= ~SSB_DMA_TRANSLATION_MASK;
> + addr |= dma->translation;
> + }
> + break;
> + case B43_DMA_ADDR_HIGH:
> + addr = dmaaddr>> 32;
> + if (!dma->translation_in_low) {
> + addr&= ~SSB_DMA_TRANSLATION_MASK;
> + addr |= dma->translation;
> + }
> + break;
> + case B43_DMA_ADDR_EXT:
> + if (dma->translation_in_low)
> + addr = dmaaddr& 0xFFFFFFFF;
> + else
> + addr = dmaaddr>> 32;
> + addr&= SSB_DMA_TRANSLATION_MASK;
> + addr>>= SSB_DMA_TRANSLATION_SHIFT;
> + break;
Sorry I missed this earlier, but when this code is compiled on a 32-bit system,
the compiler spits out
CC [M] drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.o
drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c: In function ‘b43_dma_address’:
drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c:64: warning: right shift count >= width of type
drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c:74: warning: right shift count >= width of type
This is reasonable as dma_addr_t is 32 bits.
Larry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-13 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-10 18:35 [RFC][RFT][PATCH V2 1/2] ssb: fix DMA translation for some specific boards Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-10 18:35 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-10 18:35 ` [RFC][RFT][PATCH V2 2/2] b43: fix DMA on some bugged hardware Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-10 18:35 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-10 19:11 ` Michael Büsch
2011-08-10 19:11 ` Michael Büsch
2011-08-11 0:14 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-11 0:14 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-11 4:39 ` Larry Finger
2011-08-11 4:39 ` Larry Finger
2011-08-11 8:05 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-11 8:05 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-11 16:04 ` John W. Linville
2011-08-11 16:04 ` John W. Linville
2011-08-11 16:21 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-11 16:21 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-11 16:22 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-11 16:22 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-13 22:26 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2011-08-13 22:26 ` Larry Finger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E46FA21.9060207@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.