From: Bill Kendall <wkendall@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, aelder@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] xfsdump: convert to the POSIX signal API
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:10:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E491AD8.8010504@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110812204554.GA30615@infradead.org>
On 08/12/2011 03:45 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 02:15:58PM -0500, Bill Kendall wrote:
>>> Is there any requirement that the fields
>>> other than sa_flags and sa_handler should
>>> be zeroed before use?
>>
>> The sa_sigaction field will only be used if sa_flags
>> has SA_SIGINFO set, and the sa_restored field is obsolete
>> and not specified by POSIX. Better to explicitly initialize
>> everything though, so I'll change that.
>
> sigaction actuall is a rare case where this is harmful. To quote
> the manpage:
>
> On some architectures a union is involved: do not assign to both
> sa_handler and sa_sigaction.
Thanks, I do remember reading this now. I'll leave the code as is,
which sets sa_handler instead of sa_sigaction, and does not touch
the obsolete (possibly undefined) sa_restorer. The rest of the
fields are initialized.
Bill
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-15 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-04 22:30 [PATCH v2 0/7] xfsdump: convert to using the POSIX signal API Bill Kendall
2011-08-04 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] xfsdump: remove conditional OPENMASKED code Bill Kendall
2011-08-09 22:40 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-04 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] xfsdump: process EPIPE instead of catching SIGPIPE Bill Kendall
2011-08-09 22:40 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-04 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] xfsdump: remove SIGCHLD handling Bill Kendall
2011-08-10 21:47 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-04 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] xfsdump: rework dialog timeout and EINTR reliance Bill Kendall
2011-08-10 21:47 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-04 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] xfsdump: rework dialog to use main signal handler Bill Kendall
2011-08-10 21:47 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-04 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] xfsdump: convert to the POSIX signal API Bill Kendall
2011-08-10 21:48 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-12 19:15 ` Bill Kendall
2011-08-12 20:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-15 13:10 ` Bill Kendall [this message]
2011-08-04 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] xfsdump: refactor inventory session creation Bill Kendall
2011-08-10 21:48 ` Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E491AD8.8010504@sgi.com \
--to=wkendall@sgi.com \
--cc=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.