Locking problem between em28xx and em28xx-dvb modules - Part 2

[Chris Rankin <rankincj@yahoo.com>]

Hi,

I've been looking deeper into the em28xx and em28xx-dvb modules, and I'm 
concerned that there are some races and resource leaks inherent in the current code:

a) Shouldn't em28xx_init_extension() and em28xx_add_into_devlist() be unified 
into a single function? Otherwise, consider someone plugging a DVB adapter into 
a host when the em28xx-dvb module is not yet loaded:

- em28xx_init_dev() adds new device to list.
- em28xx-dvb module registers itself, and initialises every device in the list 
(including our new one).
- em28xx_init_dev() iterates over the list of extensions (including em28xx-dvb) 
with the new device.

At this point, dvb_init() has been called twice for our new device, resulting in 
a leaked struct em28xx_dvb.

b) When em28xx_init_dev() returns something != 0, em28xx_usb_probe() frees the 
struct em28xx and exits without calling usb_put_dev().

c) There are many ways that em28xx_init_dev() can return something != 0, and not 
all of them release the V4L2 device or I2C device.

Am I understanding this code correctly, please? I can obviously extend my patch 
accordingly - it is currently running without any obvious problems, but I only 
have one DVB adapter and none that uses the ALSA extension.

Cheers,
Chris