From: Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com>
To: Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, "lrg@ti.com" <lrg@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: claim the IRQ when the fsl_ssi device is probed, not opened
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:41:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4AF1FE.9010907@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313534150-6642-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com>
Timur Tabi wrote:
> The PowerPC Freescale SSI driver is claiming the IRQ when the IRQ when
> the device is opened, which means that the /proc/interrupts entry for
> the SSI exists only during playback or capture. This also meant that
> the user won't know that the IRQ number is wrong until he tries to use
> the device. Instead, we should claim the IRQ when the device is probed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi<timur@freescale.com>
Ugh, somehow I got my patches criss-crossed. Ignore this, please. I'll
post a V2 in just a minute.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com>
To: Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, "lrg@ti.com" <lrg@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: claim the IRQ when the fsl_ssi device is probed, not opened
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:41:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4AF1FE.9010907@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313534150-6642-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com>
Timur Tabi wrote:
> The PowerPC Freescale SSI driver is claiming the IRQ when the IRQ when
> the device is opened, which means that the /proc/interrupts entry for
> the SSI exists only during playback or capture. This also meant that
> the user won't know that the IRQ number is wrong until he tries to use
> the device. Instead, we should claim the IRQ when the device is probed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi<timur@freescale.com>
Ugh, somehow I got my patches criss-crossed. Ignore this, please. I'll=20
post a V2 in just a minute.=
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-16 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-16 22:35 [PATCH] ASoC: claim the IRQ when the fsl_ssi device is probed, not opened Timur Tabi
2011-08-16 22:35 ` Timur Tabi
2011-08-16 22:41 ` Tabi Timur-B04825 [this message]
2011-08-16 22:41 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E4AF1FE.9010907@freescale.com \
--to=b04825@freescale.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.