From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.150]:44501 "EHLO ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751620Ab1HQJtY (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:49:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4E4B908B.7010805@cam.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:57:31 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron MIME-Version: 1.0 To: michael.hennerich@analog.com CC: "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] IIO: capacitance ADC cleanup (ad7150) References: <1313570537-26971-1-git-send-email-jic23@cam.ac.uk> <4E4B85B8.3010006@analog.com> In-Reply-To: <4E4B85B8.3010006@analog.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On 08/17/11 10:11, Michael Hennerich wrote: > On 08/17/2011 10:42 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Couple of bits in here that I'll push out into next set of main cleanups. >> >> Controversial bits (hence RFC) are the introduction of IIO_EV_TYPE_MAG_ADAPTIVE >> and IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH_ADAPTIVE, to handle the 'mean' shifted thresholds >> of this device. I'm far from convinced these are the right way to go, >> but best I have come up with just yet. >> >> Note this series is completely untested. I haven't even verified that the >> new chan spec related bits work right yet (can do that with a dummy driver). > Hi Jonathan, > > I have a EVAL-AD7156EBZ board, so I should be able to test the driver. > Can you please push these patches onto your iio-blue git? > Will do. Have fixed the swab16 requirements I think. Branch is capfun. The push included a few other minor bits and bobs in the master branch but nothing interesting..